Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

And how again is it racist to show an ID to vote?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Graylight · 51-55, F
If you'd take the time to read the copious available research on this subject rather than post inane memes, you might be able to answer your own question.
@Graylight maybe if you pull your head out of your ass you would see the "research" was done to confuse the masses with something that doesn't exist. There is nothing racist in any way having to show an ID to match with the name on a voter registration card.
Graylight · 51-55, F
Pure research has no agenda or political bent. No one stands to profit and scientists are rarely the friend of anyone in government.

Funny, it's always conservatives who disdain research and the discovery of truth.
@Graylight is this the part where you justify your bullshit argument by implying minorities are to stupid to get an ID? Or is this where you claim minorities are at a disadvantage getting an ID? Any "research" you try and claim is bullshit and you know it. You just can't get past the lies you have been fed with the liberal agenda.

BTW, I am not a conservative
Graylight · 51-55, F
@Harley4Life Is not as if one single report was published. It's all over the place. But I guess you're savvier than all the social scientists out there.
@Graylight "social scientist" is a bullshit made up leftist term to attempt to bring shit research into the mainstream.

I love how you keep justifying that this is racist when you are utterly wrong on this but will not accept it. In no way is showing an ID to match a name on a voter registration is racist. By you claiming that minorities are at a disadvantage makes you as much of a racist as those you call racist. Do you think minorities are to stupid to get an ID? Are they lazy? No you just feed into bullshit that is not true.
Graylight · 51-55, F
@Harley4Life [quote]"Social science is an academic discipline concerned with society and the relationships among individuals within a society, which often rely primarily on empirical approaches.

It includes anthropology, economics, political science, psychology and sociology.
In a wider sense, it may often include some fields in the humanities such as archaeology, history, law, and linguistics.

Positivist social scientists use methods resembling those of the natural sciences as tools for understanding society, and so define science in its stricter modern sense.
Interpretivist social scientists, by contrast, may use social critique or symbolic interpretation rather than constructing empirically falsifiable theories, and thus treat science in its broader sense."[/quote]
[i]https://www.sciencedaily.com/terms/social_science.htm[/i]

There are no politics in pure science. Period.
I'm not listing the various studies again; you can find them. You won't, which proves only that you know you're being willfully ignorant in favor of pushing your own belief.