Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Predictions. Thoughts?

[b][u]Brett Kavanaugh Nomination[/u]: 51-49[/b]
[i]Yes[/i]:
Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Joe Manchin (D-WV), Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND)
[i]No[/i]:
Jeff Flake (R-AZ), Susan Collins (R-ME)

First, I hope I am wrong and that the Kavanaugh nomination goes down instead. And his nomination very well may go down. But only if all the Democrats vote "no" together, as well as at least two of the following three: Collins, Flake and Murkowski.

But I think the Republicans are going to write off Collins for 2020, figuring the Democrats will flip the state. Trump's attack at this week's Mississippi rally might have been the last straw for Flake, especially if at least two of those three above in the "yes" prediction vote that way (since a 50-50 tie would be broken by Pence).

Heitkamp's probably going to lose re-election; she may view a "yes" vote as one last shot at giving her a chance. To use a football anology, her vote will be a "Hail Mary" pass. Manchin might have a fall-back if his "no" vote depresses Democrats' votes in his state. He has met with Trump. Could a cabinet position be in the offing if he loses?

Murkowski may be leaning closer to "no" than Manchin and Heitkamp. She may be taking a wait-and-see. If there's 50 other votes, she may vote "no". The Republicans know they have some cover if they get one or two Democrats, since Pence can break a tie.

[b][u]Senate[/u]: Republicans[/b]
Republicans will keep the Senate; they may even gain a seat.

Heitkamp will lose re-election. But so may Claire McCaskill (D-MO). Her numbers just aren't where a multi-term incumbent should be.

[b][u]House[/u]: Democrats[/b]

Blue wave. Nancy Pelosi will become Speaker... again.

But more importantly, the Democrats will gain the gavel in all House Committees. There will be no more stone-walling with administrative officials. Subpoenas will be issued. And the Democrats (specifically, the new Ways and Means chairman) will be able to see President Trump's tax returns under a 1924 law.

[b][u]2020[/u]: Biden[/b]

If Kamala Harris runs, she will benefit more from the Kavanaugh fallout than Lizzy Warren. There's no room in the Democrats' presidential primary for both Warren and Bernie Sanders. But if Kirsten Gillibrand runs, she may split #MeToo vote with Harris.

I think Joe Biden will run and ultimately win. Does he pick Harris or Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) as a running mate? Harris will help with the African-American vote (she's also part Indian-American; her father was from Jamaica, her mother from India). Klobuchar will help Democrats in the midwest. Biden will ensure the Democrats win Pennsylvania. With Michigan and Wisconsin, he wins the White House as well.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Johnson212 · 61-69, M
According to a survey I heard on NPR this Kavanaugh thing has created an uptick in Republican voter turnout.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@Johnson212 Yes, that is probably true, because his supporters want someone who commits sexual assault and is an aggressive drunk on the Supreme Court. Women need to stay in their place, and men should not be questioned about their sexual conquests. If they could go back a century in time, they would.
losthorizons · 51-55, M
@windinhishair no evidence of sexual assault. Scary when ou can just say someone did something. Hey. I think you grabbed my ass 42 years ago
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@losthorizons If you're a Republican, you shouldn't even believe your own allegations when they happened to you.
Johnson212 · 61-69, M
@windinhishair Why do you believe her ? Just because she say so ? The only evidence are witnesses who went on record saying it did not happen ?
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@Johnson212 Only the ones you are listening to. I want to see all witnesses interviewed under oath to make an informed decision. She was the more credible witness. But you need everyone weighing in under oath to be fully informed.

More problematic is Kavanaugh's lies under oath during his testimony. That disqualifies him from office. Get another nominee who takes the position seriously. Gorsuch didn't have these problems with the same Senate.
losthorizons · 51-55, M
@Johnson212 exactly right. Not one shred of evidence. You need evidence of which she has none. She may have been assaulted, but has the wrong person.
Johnson212 · 61-69, M
This whole two-week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit on Kavanaugh, nothing more. It is funded with millions of dollars from outside, left-wing opposition groups. There have been over 10 million dollars spent on TV ads either assailing or defending him.

American Civil Liberties Union, abandoned its policy of not endorsing or attacking candidates in order to challenge Kavanaugh. Monday they alone purchased more than $1 million in ads opposing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. Advocacy organizations are able to keep donors' contributions secret except they do have to disclose TV.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@Johnson212

Any one who joins with their misogynistic drunken friends in high school to basically call a girl a slut in their high school yearbook and then at age 53 says he meant it as a compliment is not someone I want to even visit the Supreme Court, let alone sit on it.
losthorizons · 51-55, M
I didn't see slut anywhere in the hearings.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@losthorizons

His [b]yearbook[/b]!


"Renate Alumnius."

Do you have kids? Do you have a daughter or sister or a niece?

How would you feel if eight footballs players at an all-boys school, who also wrote boasting of excess drinking, partying and involving themselves in sexual games, mentioned your daughter or sister or niece as their "alumnius" in the high school yearbook?

If you are going to say you believe Kavanaugh's "explanation" that it was meant as an endearing term of "friendship", don't bother responding.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
It clearly wasn't a term of endearment. But Trump supporters are used to twisting themselves into pretzels to deny the obvious. They are also saying that Trump wasn't mocking Ford on his Adoration Event in Mississippi earlier this week.
losthorizons · 51-55, M
@beckyromero I still don't see anything about slut there. You can't just make stuff up. You can't assume, because you know what that means
Johnson212 · 61-69, M
@beckyromero So for all future politicians and court nominees we need to read their teenage yearbooks. Got ya. I want to see Nancy Pelosi and Diane Feinsteins high school yearbooks and their classmates yearbooks. This is beyond ridiculous.

I had one beer!
How did you get there?----I don't remember.
How'd you get there? ------I don't remember.
Where is the place? ------I don't remember.
How many years ago was it? ------I don't know.
What neighborhood was it in?----- I don't know.
Where's the house?------I don't know.
Who took you home?-----I don't know.

But I only had one beer. That I remember.

With all this I don't remember you have no choice but to go by the evidence and what evidence do we have? Witnesses, something you often don't have in a sexual assault. What to the witnesses say? They don't remember any such party or event. End of story.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@Johnson212 The issue isn't yearbooks. The issue is sexual assault. His yearbook became important because of the accusations. If Feinstein or Pelosi are nominated to the Court, and they are accused of sexual assault, there should be an investigation that follows the evidence wherever it leads. Even to their high school yearbooks, or any other source of information.
losthorizons · 51-55, M
Didn't Feinstein employ a Russian spy for 10 years? Didn't the Michigan guy beat his wife? There are police reports and evidence there. Why are we not investigations that?
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@losthorizons Is Feinstein up for the Supreme Court? Is the "Michigan guy"?
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@Johnson212

"Devil's Triange"

A "drinking game"?

Yeah, right.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@beckyromero Devils Triangle referred to a MMF threesome in the early 1980s, as it does now. That's just one of his lies.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@Johnson212 [quote] I want to see Nancy Pelosi and Diane Feinsteins high school yearbooks and their classmates yearbooks.[/quote]

Here you go.

[b]Nancy Peolosi[/b]:

As for DiFi, she was class president of Sacred Heart High School as a senior in 1951.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@beckyromero She probably worked her tail off too. I don't know if she likes beer as much as Kavanaugh craves it though. 😉
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@losthorizons Didn't Feinstein employ a Russian spy for 10 years?

In a word? "No."

also @windinhishair
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@windinhishair

Walter Mondale considered picking her as his vice presidential nominee.

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4-vjp6crKk]
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@beckyromero Before he picked Ferraro.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@losthorizons [quote]Didn't the Michigan guy beat his wife?[/quote]

What "Michigan guy"?

I don't know who you are referring to there.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@windinhishair [quote]Before he picked Ferraro.[/quote]

Correct. DiFi was on the short list. The convention that year was in San Francisco.