Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Chrsitine Blasey Ford - DO NOT TESTIFY MONDAY

Christine Blasey Ford has no obligation to testify in the hearing Monday. She should absolutely stand her ground that an investigation be conducted first and foremost.

Her testifying in a hearing before politicians/lawmakers is ABSOLUTELY the WRONG FORUM in which for her to speak about, assuming it to be true, such a deeply disturbing situation. What we do know is that the hearing will surely degrade into a character assassination of a woman and/or a man both of whom should be appearing and discussing the details of the event(s) that allegedly took place in front of authorities (police, FBI, whatever appropriate agency should investigate) so personal accounts can be properly documented, witnesses interviewed and versions of the events properly evaluated as to what, if anything, should be done with truth being sought and charges being filed, as appropriate.

In NO WAY should she appear, testify and answer questions by senators with political and professional (and some personal) agendas. This is NOT the time, nor place, no forum to explore what did/did not happen.

This hearing, should it happen and she testify, will be embarrassing, disturbing and degrading for everyone; Kavanaugh, Ford, Committee Members who will disgrace themselves as much as Kavanaugh and Ford and all Americans as to how we conduct ourselves and will be a complete mockery of our process, government and character.

Everyone, Republicans and Democrats, delay this confirmation and give this the appropriate attention it deserves.

Shame... shame... shame on anyone who thinks she should testify in this forum and this confirmation hearing shouldn’t be delayed.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Graylight · 51-55, F
And thus the request for an separate FBI investigation. There the facts could've been gathered and examined, there the witnesses could've been interviewed and there some truth might've come out. Instead, we're left with the court of public opinion and a story told in a room of men who've mostly already reached conclusions along party lines.

Except to hear Grassley tell it, "that's not what the FBI does." Unless it's nominee Clarence Thomas and accuser Anita Hill in 1991, which is when they did [i]exactly[/i] that.
Sinnerwithaheart · 56-60, F
@Graylight Blah, Blah, Blah.
Graylight · 51-55, F
@Sinnerwithaheart Excellent response. Our education tax dollars hard at work.
Sinnerwithaheart · 56-60, F
@Graylight I put myself through college with no help.
bonviveur · F
@Sinnerwithaheart Unimpressive of a college graduate.

"Blah, blah, blah..."

"Did not ask for you opinion."

"I will bitch."

You've clearly wasted your money if this is all you have to offer to the OP. Offer something of substance, say, an intellectual and thoughtful response.
Sinnerwithaheart · 56-60, F
@bonviveur Does not matter to me what you think.
Graylight · 51-55, F
@Sinnerwithaheart If you're this hostile towards others, why even be on a site like this?
bonviveur · F
@Sinnerwithaheart Why?

Compelled to comment on the post and that you’re tired of hearing about this topic.

Why even comment?

Why continue the dialogue?

Do you have a purpose in being here?

Do your words have any relevance and deep meaning?

And if you don’t wish to hear others opinions or replies, what satisfaction or joy would you get from hearing the echo of your own voice?