Perhaps since she demanded to testify the Senate committee should subpoena Dr Ford?

Personal attacks are what THEY do. @SteelHands

@jackjjackson Stating my opinion on her looks combined with her 35 year old attempted accusation wasn't an attack, personal or otherwise.

I didn’t say I disagreed lol. @SteelHands

@SteelHands So it's OK that Trump cheated on his wife with Stormy Daniels and paid her off, because she's really hot.

I'm really not very interested in what other ppl do with their genitals, who or why anyone has to resort to a hooker, or the fact teenagers tell lies about their sexual life,



believe it or not.

I sure as hell don’t want to see any video of any of these septuagenarian politicians 😲 @SteelHands

@SteelHands Then you don't think our leaders should set an example. That's fine, as long as you're consistent, and don't hold one side to a strict standard while letting the other side get away with everything.

Same standards whatever they are should apply to all. @LeopoldBloom

@jackjjackson Then Trump needs to resign.

We are talking about judges not politicians. Both sides are equally out of line. @LeopoldBloom

@jackjjackson Judge Kavanaugh's credibility being attacked by these flimsy claims is truly astonishing.

The Democrats are being ridiculous about all of this nonsense because they are afraid of having lost power to force laws down the throats of society through the courts.

Everybody knows it. Someone needed to say it.

He should have been confirmed last week.

How do we KNOW who is the truth teller? @SteelHands

@jackjjackson We don't know, and it doesn't matter. Kavanaugh isn't automatically entitled to a seat on the Supreme Court. If we have questions, they should be answered.

Kavanaugh is going to shove laws down peoples' throats too, just different laws.

It's nothing but a dirty rumor generated for political ends. It's obvious. Perhaps there is other information you've heard @Jackjjacksonjr.

Point is, the accusations are not even within the scope of anything that can be researched or verified. Decades old vague maybe this or that's.

A bunch of political patooey.

@LeopoldBloom A constitutionalist judge is the opposite of an activist one.

Your belief that he's going to legislate from the bench is misguided.

@SteelHands Originalism is just a fancy word for ultra-conservatism. Originalists legislate from the bench just as much as liberals; you just don't notice because you happen to agree with their rulings.

@LeopoldBloom That's not so. I agree that the Constitution is important and that it's plainly stated charter and guide need to be reaffirmed, not overturned by those who try to warp language, infer hidden meanings or flaws in the genius of its writings.

I notice more because I've read all the historical papers and the constitution several times. And I don't do what you just did and place words in others mouths that they didn't say.

@SteelHands The people who wrote the Constitution couldn't imagine the world we live in today. Would they approve of fracking? What was their opinion of single-payer health care? The idea of women voting would have been inconceivable to them. The fact is that your side is putting words in their mouths too, you just won't admit it. The Constitution is a framework that we can build on. If you know of any law that is in direct conflict with the Constitution, I would urge you to file a lawsuit to have it overturned.

[i]Marbury v. Madison[/i] established the concept of judicial review, and that was in 1804 when many of the original framers were still alive, yet they didn't object to it.

I stand by my original assertion that "originalism" is merely "conservatism."

When one thinks about it you can also “stand by” my trash can lol. @LeopoldBloom

@jackjjackson The Constitution is a living document.

Biblical originalism is also bullshit.

It is not a living document that veers of the highway at your whim. @LeopoldBloom

@jackjjackson I didn't say it veers at my whim, but anyone who claims they have perfect knowledge of what the framers meant, and how they would apply their ideas to the modern world, is either lying or deluded.

Who has said he or she has such perfect knowledge? @LeopoldBloom

That the world endeavors to do new undiscovered things was not unknown by those who wrote the constitution.

That women would someday be included in the responsibility and rights of civic participation was not something they were unable to concieve nor was it counted as a thing unlikely by most of them.

Anyone stating that they erred for an inability to forsee change is blind as they say that the framers were. Only the framers weren't.

The constitution is not to be construed as a powers enabling document. It's to be construed as a power shoring and limiting document.

They knew that as the means of government grows through its expansion of numbers that it's ability to tread on the freedom's of its governed through greediness needed to be shackled.

Governed are not obliged to think like the government, follow moral decrees of the government, or pay increasing tributes to the government or its chosen favorite causes.

It never had the right to stick its nose into my or anyone else's moral business lacking a definite , named, demonstrated direct victim of my or someone else's intentioned acts of provable harm. Or make laws to create sacred cows, groups of special privilege, or persecute the majority for excluding the fringe behaviors of degenerates and oddballs from their daily life.

It's not the job of government to legislate morals, promote the inferior to a protected class, or issue surcharges to the normal for not worshiping freaks and weaklings, deify or demonize infants, give their blessing to self mutilations, wombicide, or racial erasure. Appoint itself as God, pose as Mother nature, act like the human race's trust fund mom and dad.

Governments duties are quite clearly outlined by the constitution. Our elected officials ignore them while doing all kinds of law making they never had the right to do.

I don't care what you think. They were smarter than you and until you figure that out you'll be wrong and so will the ones who think government is a solution.

It's not said but the framers knew government isn't a grand solution maker. It's only a means to open doors to people finding solutions.

And it works. But you gotta follow it's rules or pay a heavy social price. So fuck you and that fast ugly ol lying ass female professor who nobody would have wanted to fuck.