If witness tampering is illegal;

Why has this gone un-noticed by the GOP (The party of law and order).

It makes reference to the two GOP (and initial supporters of Trump) suspects, recently charged with respectively; Insider trading and misuse of election contributions. Because they supported Trump, Trump clearly believes they shouldn't have been arrested or indicted. And blames Sessions because Sessions didn't stop it happening...Isn't there something in the oath of office about upholding the law and the Constitution and NOT personal gain? 🤔

Top | Newest First | Oldest First

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

Let’s start with a civics quiz. The DOJ is part of what branch of the US government?

View 44 more replies »

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

[image deleted]@room101

room101 · 51-55, M

@jackjjackson What have I told you before about repeating yourself. I suppose that, living in your little echo chamber as you do, hearing yourself over and over and over again, and again, and again.......is daily life.

But for us, it's pretty boring 😴😴😴

This message was deleted by the author of the main post.

MistyCee

Really, I think it's just the "take care" clause, along with the impeachment for high crimes and midemeanors in the Constitution, and this actually isn't going unnoticed by the GOP as much as it's been ignored.

My suspicion is that most Republicans are holding their nose and hoping to get as much out of him as they can before things go South, like Kavanaugh.

eli1601 · 70-79, M

@MistyCee 😂 Keep hoping

MistyCee

@eli1601 I'm not even hoping for the South part in the next chapter, tbh, as much as for a chapter after that that isn't truly horrific, when it just becomes accepted that being elected president means you're above the law and can do whatever the hell you want.

Northwest · M

Seems like witness tampering to me. The traditional GOP is not going to say anything, with the midterms looming. The President is immune from witness tampering anyway, but not saying anything could backfire.

To him, it's a risk free strategy. If the traditionalists complain, and he manages to drown them out, with Twitter rhetoric, then they permanently lose. If the traditionalists reach their audience, it matters very little, as they'll still vote for his positions.