Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

It's an Obama thing, so get rid of it..

Even if it's going to be detrimental to bees...After all, they're only responsible for a third of the food we eat...But wait!! Not if the GMO lobby can expand their ambitions, they don't need bees, in fact, they're a bad thing. Make sterile crops, sell more seeds to grow more crops. Oh, and there's the hunters too to consider...



https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-45068650

[quote]The Trump administration has overturned bans on the use of pesticides linked to declining bee populations and the cultivation of genetically modified crops in US national wildlife refuges.

The move, reversing a policy adopted in 2014, has attracted heavy criticism from environmentalists.

It was announced in a memo by the US Fish and Wildlife Service.

Limited agricultural activity is allowed on some national wildlife refuges.

Study 'shows neonic pesticides harm bees'
The Fish and Wildlife Service's deputy director, Greg Sheehan, said in the memo that the blanket ban on neonicotinoid pesticides and GM crops on refuges would end, with decisions about their use being made on a case-by-case basis.

He said genetically modified organisms helped "maximise production", and that neonics might be required "to fulfil needed farming practices".

Mr Sheehan added that the move on GM crops would improve the supply of food for migratory birds including ducks and geese, which are shot by hunters on many of the nation's refuges.[/quote]
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Graylight · 51-55, F
Excellent, because the dire warnings about the chain effect of declining bee populations hasn't been at the forefront of ecological discussions for, like, ten years now.

There's ignoring science and then there's battling science in the name of personal enrichment. Trump will understand when he reaches his particular circle of hell.