Yep. Still only two genders.

@Graylight And human history.

@Graylight You mean the scientific community that's constantly shouted down, threatened, and run off campuses for not bowing to the delusion? Just curious.

@Sicarium No, I mean the actual scientific community made up of numerous different disciplines, from anthropology to chemistry. The same community that performs research and produces vetted, reproducible studies based in the scientific method. Scientific community that has nothing to do with politics or college campuses.

@Graylight ...nothing to do with college campuses? What? Are you really that uninformed?

College campuses are the center of the scientific community. Been that way for a while. And SJWs and progressives are openly attacking and harassing scientists. Everyone from biologists who dare suggest there's biological differences between men and women because it doesn't support a 85th gender to psychologists who cite 40 years of scientific study.

@Sicarium Politicizing science, as in sticking to established dogma rather than accepting new information, is one of the most destructive forces in the scientific community.

@UndeadPrivateer Oh...so only people who accept your new dogma, I mean information, are really scientists. That's convenient.

@Sicarium Try trolling harder, that was pathetic. Or maybe just open your eyes. One of the two.

@UndeadPrivateer Oh yeah, anything that challenges your dogma just must be trolling.

As for opening eyes, Google Bret Weinstein and get back to me. If you're not completely full shit that is.

@UndeadPrivateer Hard to explain science to someone who doesn't even understand the topic.

@Graylight Hahaha, I've got a Master's in Geology, but please, explain "science" to me.

@Sicarium Someone should, because you don't seem to grasp it at all. Though it would explain why you find yourself under a rock so often.

@Graylight Ah, so you are going with, "only the people I agree with can be scientists" then. I gotcha.

@Sicarium Nope. I'm saying some learn better than others and some even use critical thinking before they speak.

@Graylight Oh, so you get to decide who learns better than others or who's using the correct "critical thinking". That's much better.

You keep dancing around the issue. Explain to me why it's OK to shut down scientific discussion and research you disagree with.

@Sicarium I dint decide. Your posts make it evident.

When did I say any research should be shut down?

@Graylight You misunderstood the first part of my reply. Try again.

I asked you specifically about what's been happening on college campuses. Your response was to deny and deflect, while pretending I don't understand science. That tells me that you approve of what's been happening on campuses, that you approve of shutting down scientific voices and research you don't approve of. So, why is that OK?

@Sicarium This is minutae, far afield from the original post.

If you want to debate science (I have a Master's as well), create a post and I'll be happy to jump in.

@Graylight No, no more deflection. Why do you approve of shutting down scientific voices and research you don't agree with?

@Sicarium Again, never said it, don't believe it.

@Graylight Then why did you deflect and deny when I brought it up?

@Graylight Since it looks like you've gone quiet to avoid a direct question, again, I'll leave you with this:

You do not have a monopoly on science. You do not get to decide who a real scientist is. So your very first comment on this post was completely bullshit. I think you're more interested in virtue signalling and distorting truth to fit your agenda. But, in case I'm wrong, I'll leave you with this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nMXGLrl7dM

@Sicarium I literally never said or anything even vaguely like it. I repeat, troll harder or open your eyes and read what I actually wrote. Why would I care about Bret Weinstein in relation to any of this? I'm aware of who he is and the (rather silly) controversy around him. That's just politics, not politicizing science. There's overlap between the two, especially in regards to climate change, but I'm not talking about that.

@Sicarium Try to follow this. Sometimes people go quiet because they log off because they live a real life. I never said what you accuse me of and your contention that I deflect and deny is your opinion only. As I don't respect that much, I choose not to answer your provocation. Easy enough?

@UndeadPrivateer Nah, you implied it though.


Get fucked. If I'm just a troll, feel free to leave.


You wouldn't. You'd have to open your own eyes for that. And you'd have to stop pretending everyone who says something you don't like is a troll.


Umm...wut? That's exactly what politicizing science is.


That's funny, because Weinstein wasn't talking about that either. And no, I don't believe you have any idea what the controversy was.

@Graylight Translation, you're still avoiding direct questions. And anything of real substance. But you'll keep pretending to have a monopoly on science while you ignore attacks on science.