I believe this is his most controversial move yet and I honestly do not have a prediction of an outcome. It is economically dangerous. With his Steel and Aluminum tariffs he is disregarding "the rules" of which the USA was the primary architect. In terms of Trade, the USA is too important to ignore, however if this escalates it could bring on a recession.
Great discussion group...thanks!
Oh just read this article now....a few hours after I posted this: http://nationalpost.com/opinion/john-ivison-the-great-patriotic-trade-war-against-the-u-s-begins-on-canada-day The problem with these Tariffs is that it is going to cost us more for some goods. :( As the USA will now be paying 25% more for steel. You cannot produce enough internally.
Another article I read... http://nationalpost.com/news/politics/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-heres-what-could-happen-if-trumps-trade-war-escalates
Another article on the Trade Off. More jobs but less overall wealth. Example of Washing Machine prices. The tarrif protected industry gets more jobs. However, overall incomes are lost to paying more for the Tariffed products.
Information from another article... "Shortly after tariffs were announced, steel suppliers, no longer as fearful of price competition, began jacking up prices — they’re no fools. That has meant a 40 percent increase since January in the cost of steel for their customers who use it in their finished products, according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. They can either pass that increase on to you or be less profitable.
The story is the same with aluminum: Brewers are forecasting that they’ll pay $347.7 million more for aluminum cans. That has small craft-beer makers such as Melvin Brewing in Alpine, Wyo., which packages 75 percent of its products in cans, fretting about impending prices rises and the risks of passing them along to consumers. Try not to be bitter about it.
Job losses from the metal tariffs alone could top 400,000, according to an analysis by Trade Partnership Worldwide, a nonpartisan consultancy that supports free trade. So while U.S. Steel can celebrate the restart of two blast furnaces in Granite City, Ill., and bring back about 800 workers, 7,500 jobs will be lost elsewhere, the consultancy estimates." https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/15/opinion/sunday/trump-china-tariffs-trade-farmers.html
I think it is safe to say right now...Option2 - Destabilize is occurring.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
The glaring omission is whether the trade policy will be good for the United States but since you’ve loaded the question of course you would slant the possible responses. My opinion is that the trade policy will be beneficial to the United States which is the primary JOB of the President.
@jackjjackson Yes, the question is loaded definitely. But maybe a less loaded question would be. Does the USA gain if it drives more jobs home but at the same time loses lower value the goods due to free trade? And a second question, does the USA win if it brings about a recession or depression?
Those comments didn’t exactly unload your question lol. Of course you have a negative opinion. Everyone gets or should get thst. However the status quo was is and would continue ur to be bad for the US. @okaybut
@jackjjackson It is unfortunate I am coming off that way. I am just looking at the rewards vs the downside. I do believe the world will be much better off with a better USA trade deficit. China will stop paying the bills soon.
