Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Which is more important, not killing children when they are in the womb or killing them at school with an automatic rifle?

Supposing you could only pick one?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
hertoy · 70-79, M
There is no picking one. Killing children is obscene. However the reality is that thousands of babies are aborted for every child murder. Two wrongs do not make a right, but numbers don't lie.
Fernie · F
@hertoy didn't you just "pick one?"
hertoy · 70-79, M
@Fernie No I did not
Serenitree · F
@hertoy Okay. There are children who were born, because they weren't aborted. Instead, mom kept the baby alive, only to then torture and starve and other ways abuse the baby for a few years, until they or a boyfriend kill the child. That of course is much more desirable than an abortion. Or they never do kill the kid, but the kid is so damaged, he or she goes on to destroy their own offspring.

I do not agree with using abortion as a form of birth control. I think if you've had one and you're back for another, it's time for a tubaligation. That should be a law. Gun control isn't going to stop murderous people from finding a way to kill, and stopping abortion, isn't going to give kids a better chance at a decent life. .
DrBenway · 61-69, M
@Serenitree "Gun control isn't going to stop murderous people from finding a way to kill"

It will slow them down some or at least make them get more creative.
Serenitree · F
@DrBenway okay
hertoy · 70-79, M
@Serenitree What seemed to me as the framework of disagreement collapsed into seeming agreement...Did I miss something?
Serenitree · F
@hertoy Yes. I can't change your mind, and you can't change mine. That wasn't so much agreement as deciding not to continue trying to change your mind.