Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

NYT op ed: "Liberals, You’re Not as Smart as You Think" ... Thoughts?

.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/12/opinion/sunday/liberals-youre-not-as-smart-as-you-think-you-are.html

Liberals, You’re Not as Smart as You Think
By Gerard Alexander

Mr. Alexander is a professor of political science at the University of Virginia.

May 12, 2018

I know many liberals, and two of them really are my best friends. Liberals make good movies and television shows. Their idealism has been an inspiration for me and many others. Many liberals are very smart. But they are not as smart, or as persuasive, as they think.

And a backlash against liberals — a backlash that most liberals don’t seem to realize they’re causing — is going to get President Trump re-elected.


Thoughts?
Top | New | Old
DarkMoon · 26-30, M
Trump has successfully harnessed bigotry into votes, as a lot of politicians around the world have.
Liberals need to expose what Trump is actually doing, that he's not really the ordinary voter's friend, rather than insulting the people who voted for him.
This message was deleted by its author.
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
This message was deleted by its author.
SW-User
It's more of an attitude issue than anything. Being an elitist doesn't win people to your side. It only ensures that there will be a backlash. Even if your ideas would be good for the country, if you present them in a smug, condescending way no one will listen.
yeronlyman · 51-55, M
It got him elected in the first place... and then the conservatives with get the liberals elected and so goes the dance... mean while real life goes on in the shadows of dichotomised and polarised politics of name calling and one-upmanship
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
I don't agree. Most people who use the term "liberals" as a smear tactic often get their hatred of liberals from various youtubers, 5 minute conversations, conspiracy theories, "alternative" history, rehash Breitbart and outrage politics a lot.

How do you act in such a way that is convenient for someone who's got this whole fabricated delusion about people they've never met?

I'm sorry but if one votes for someone not based on ethics but because the TV says so is honestly just a really shitty person. I think their the exact same people who would vote for another Hitler if it just meant hating on their enemies. That makes them very shallow.
Can’t the same be said of both sides as the partisan divide widens? @SatanBurger
Xuan12 · 36-40, M
How is this different from a million other op-eds?
SW-User
Well, that is true from individual to individual. Not collectively. There are very intelligent and smart liberals and at the same time very gullible and stupid ones :p

Same with conservatives. It goes from person to person
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@jackjjackson Exactly. An astute of a politician as Obama, even back then, wouldn't have made such remarks without assuming they'd at least be leaked, if not recorded.

Obama knew he wasn't going to win the closed Pennsylvania primary. Which is why I believe he said it to explain his eventually loss.

Hillary was winning a majority of votes in closed primaries. In fact, after the primary season was over, she won a majority of votes in all primaries and caucuses. But, according to the rules of the game (and that's how they campaigned and allocated resources), Obama won the nomination.
Absolutely true and that’s how the president won the general in 2016 - according to the rules @beckyromero
SW-User
@jackjjackson I really love that quote a lot
plinkplonk · F
I hate to say it but I agree with him.
Interesting piece, and I think it brings up some good points about attacking Trump voters and not Trump.
For one thing, I'd like to know what he means by "smart". I.Q.? Knowledge? Ability to predict outcomes? Education?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment