Any liberal haters out there willing to commit to apologize and admit they were wrong if the facts ultimately establish that?

I’m a conservative that will commit to that if the facts ultimately prove I was mistaken.

Any liberals or conservatives NOT willing to make such a commitments are immediately transformed

[image deleted]

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Northwest · M

Are you sure this is the meme you want to pick.

The height of hypocrisy, is your vote for Trump, when he specifically said, that he was not willing to commit, prior to the elections, to accepting the elections results.

When did liberals not accept official results? Remember Bush? There's opposition to the blatant attacks on the first amendment, and implicit racism, not so disguised xenophobia and the daily, non-stop lies, from the President, and there's accepting the will of the people, as well as the law.

Can you say that Trump has respect the courts? or did he try to obfuscate, by claiming that a judge ruled against Trump rip off University, because he's Mexican and Trump is building a wall?

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

As I recall the democrats spent a lot of time in court fighting the results of the 2000 election. That is far from acceptance. You didn’t directly answer the question. Is your response an indirect NO? @Northwest

Northwest · M

@jackjjackson [quote]As I recall the democrats spent a lot of time in court fighting the results of the 2000 election.[/quote]

Your recall is faulty. The Florida recount was mandatory, due to the close margin. The court challenge was to see if they will do a machine recount or a hand recount. The Supreme Court ruled it will be a machine recount, confirming the 930 votes Bush margin (later it was narrowed down to about 300 votes).

Gore accepted the ruling.

[quote]You didn’t directly answer the question. Is your response an indirect NO?[/quote]

Why would I not accept the rule of law? I was questioning your assertion that liberals somewhat did not.

Is your response, an indirect acknowledgment, that Trump does not respect the rule of law, or anything/anyone that does not agree with him?

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

[quote]Your recall is faulty. The Florida recount was mandatory, due to the close margin. The court challenge was to see if they will do a machine recount or a hand recount. The Supreme Court ruled it will be a machine recount, confirming the 930 votes Bush margin (later it was narrowed down to about 300 votes). Gore accepted the ruling.
[/quote]

Gore and the democrats spent millions of dollars on a legal team headed by David Boise who took any and all issues through any and all courts as far as the process went. Running out of appeals after all thst is hardly accepted the ruling unless Gore had a squadron of tanks he was planning on driving up Pennsylvania Avenue.

All you had to to was a simple yes or no like I did as to whether you would agree with the final determination and admit the any preconceived notions of what it would be were innacursfe if in fact that’s the way it turns out. Instead you launched into a lengthy off topic speech.

@Northwest

Northwest · M

@jackjjackson [quote]Any liberal haters out there willing to commit to apologize and admit they were wrong if the facts ultimately establish that?[/quote]

I am totally on topic. You proposed that liberals are haters, and suggested they don't respect official results.

The reason the Democrats challenged the Florida results, is because there were questions about the ballots. You're confusing what was done: a perfectly legal, challenge, with refusing to accept legal results, as Trump suggested he would do, if the results were not to his liking.

Perhaps you missed my statement:

[quote]Why would I not accept the rule of law?[/quote]

I am challenging your fantasy of democrats not accepting the final results.