A federal judge recently ruled that AR-15's are not protected by the 2nd ammendment of the US constitution. Thoughts?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

I don't mind if a responsible gun owner wants a cannon to shoot ducks. But make sure he is responsible sane, and keeps the damned thing secure.. Because if he doesn't, he should be charged with every offence the gun is involved in..

MistyCee

@whowasthatmaskedman I'd like that to go for "failure to report" "stolen," guns please as well, please.

whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M

Its even easier than that. The last owner of record is the guy. Period. No ifs and or buts.. If a weapon is stolen, a special offence of "Failure to secure a firearm", is disqualification from owning a license, a hefty fine and jail time. That would make people lock up their guns properly and have security on them. Have all the guns you want. Just be absolutely responsible for them..@MistyCee