This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SW-User
@naughtylass. Not that I should even address your typical overreaction, but... I don't feel as though I can dictate what others want to say. If I did, it wouldn't be an exasperated sigh but a flag I'd be applying to the question. And as others are entitled to their opinions, so am I. Someone said once, some people see equality as oppression.
There are questions addressing Clinton's dress, quality of voice and appearance all over this site as well as the internet. Not looking doesn't equate non-existence.
Ladycae isn't picking out specific words; the comment concerned your vitriolic animosity and use of denigrating comments regarding Clinton. But like most conservatives, you'll bury the argument in semantics rather than address the spirit of it.
And yeah, it isn't so much an obsession about Trump so much as protecting the greater part of this country and the world from him over the next 4 years.
And while you respond to "liberals" more than you post questions about Clinton, all you really have to do is check to see you have indeed posted questions mentioning her.
There are questions addressing Clinton's dress, quality of voice and appearance all over this site as well as the internet. Not looking doesn't equate non-existence.
Ladycae isn't picking out specific words; the comment concerned your vitriolic animosity and use of denigrating comments regarding Clinton. But like most conservatives, you'll bury the argument in semantics rather than address the spirit of it.
And yeah, it isn't so much an obsession about Trump so much as protecting the greater part of this country and the world from him over the next 4 years.
And while you respond to "liberals" more than you post questions about Clinton, all you really have to do is check to see you have indeed posted questions mentioning her.