Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Donald Trump is a very very________________fill in the blank please ?

Donald Trump is a very very animated, insanely stupid, arrogant, and reckless man. Your turn. ☺
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
eli1601 · 70-79, M
smart and competent, unlike Barak Obama, President
TJNewton · M
@eli1601 Delusional
Zonuss · 41-45, M
@eli1601 Obama is smart. ☺
GunSmoke9 · 56-60, M
@Zonuss Obama wanted to fundamentally transform American, Trump loves America.
Zonuss · 41-45, M
@GunSmoke9 No. It was the establishment that was trying to force Obama to do things some things that he himself did not want to do. Obama is a family man who respects people.
If you cannot see this, then you are indeed a lost soul.
Graylight · 51-55, F
@GunSmoke9 Again with the "fundamentally transforming the country." How so, again?
GunSmoke9 · 56-60, M
@Zonuss Obama wanted to fundamentally transform American, his words. Why would you want to fundamentally transform American if you love it? A great family man, but a bad president.
GunSmoke9 · 56-60, M
@Graylight And I'll keep saying it. Like turning us into a European socialist country. Giving more power to the federal government. I bet you never question why he wanted to fundamentally transform American.
Graylight · 51-55, F
In one speech, he said the country - facing a change of guard - was 5 days away from being fundamentally changed. His meaning was very clear: economic policies that favored more people, debt relief, a shift in the American Cconsciousness that helped progress the country toward a brighter future. He said it in the very same speech.

He also said later that such a fundamental shift was not necessary if the proper work was put in. Forest for the trees.
BelEsprit · 26-30, F
@Graylight BAM!!!!
GunSmoke9 · 56-60, M
@Graylight Not possible to love something, but want to fundamentally transform it. His idea was to make us like Europe.
Zonuss · 41-45, M
@GunSmoke9 If there is room for a change, then let it be. America is constantly changing, and I seriously doubt you even understand what that word fundamentally means.
And no the US is not like Europe. Man, stop watching Fox News. ☺
GunSmoke9 · 56-60, M
@Zonuss Do you understand what fundamentally means? If up to Obama or the progressives now we will be like Europe or worse. I watch more than FOX, do you? Or do you get all your information from liberal outlets?
Zonuss · 41-45, M
@GunSmoke9 You sound like a brainwashed idiot who is obsessed or heavily influenced with politics.
Graylight · 51-55, F
@GunSmoke9 You can love something and want to change it to make it its best possible incarnation. How is that hard to understand? And...maybe not define an 8-year presidency but a single word spoken before he was sitting president.

The fact that you ask Zonuss if all his media outlets are liberal in nature is a clear indication all yours are conservative. Hardly objective and well informed.
GunSmoke9 · 56-60, M
@Zonuss I care What's going on in the country. Do you ever watch FOX? I asked before, was the question too hard? To fundamentally transform something means to destroy it then replace it.
Graylight · 51-55, F
@GunSmoke9
Transform: to make a thorough or dramatic change in the form, appearance, or character of.
a : to change in composition or structure
b : to change the outward form or appearance of
c : to change in character or condition : convert

Not to "destroy and replace."
GunSmoke9 · 56-60, M
@Graylight He mentioned Fox, I asked if he just watches just liberal media. I watch CNN and MSNBC, listen to liberal radio stations. I love my spouse but I want to fundamentally transform her/ him. Does that sound like love to you?
GunSmoke9 · 56-60, M
@eli1601 Remember when Obama got rid of the missile defense system that Bush had in place? Obama cancelled it because Putin didn't want it.
Graylight · 51-55, F
@GunSmoke9 You're referring to the European Phased Adaptive Approach, a modified missile defense plan emphasizing medium-range ballistic missile threat, [i]instead of[/i] radar and two-stage ground-based interceptors in Europe. The U.S. focused on short- and medium-range missile defense protection for the European allies, which Russia happened to object to the most.

Remember when conservatives looked at facts instead of making up fairy tales?
GunSmoke9 · 56-60, M
@Graylight So. Putin didn't want it, Obama said ok. Why? Was Obama Putin bitch? Was Obama afraid of Putin? Maybe even colluding with Russia.
Graylight · 51-55, F
@GunSmoke9 Conservatives have absolutely no tenable leg to stand on when talking about presidential relations and Russia. You shouldn't even be allowed to bring it up.
Zonuss · 41-45, M
@GunSmoke9 Of course I watch a few segments on Fox News with Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity. I just look at them and laugh. 🙂
GunSmoke9 · 56-60, M
@Graylight I shouldn't be allowed? I guess free speech only should belong to the left.
Graylight · 51-55, F
@GunSmoke9 Not on constitutional grounds. On the grounds that you make no sense.
GunSmoke9 · 56-60, M
@Graylight Didn't Obama cancel the missile defense system because Putin didn't want it? Or should we just ignore that fact? If I make no sense, why do you keep responding?