Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why do you think think an improper balance of collectivism vs individualism causes so much strife?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Sicarium · 46-50, M
Those are two mutually exclusive concepts. There is no balance between them. They're antithetical to each other.
@Sicarium In order for a society to exist in relative comfort, there has to be a measure of collectivism as well as a measure of individualism. Taxation is a necessary evil that provides for upkeep of infrastructure and things like education and civil defense or law enforcement. Do you have a better idea?
Sicarium · 46-50, M
@puck61 That's not what collectivism is though. You're getting into the social contract stuff, which was entirely based on individualism. It's the reasoning why someone who was born into a society are part of that society without their expressed willingness. The gist of the social contract says that once you've partaken in that society, you've expressed willingness. That can only be important if the individual is important.

Collectivism doesn't even bother. It just says you're a member of this group merely because you exist. You have no say, no choice. And if you degrade the group, you are expendable.

Taxation, education, and civil defense aren't collectivism. They're not byproducts of collectivism. Individualism or collectivism would be the reason you have the them, the explanation or the force. But they are not the source of society.
@Sicarium I know what you are saying, but I am talking straight 'collectivism vs individualism' as accepted by the general populace.