Why Do Leftists Hate FACTS?

I have always been amazed by Leftist's absolute and almost psychopathic hatred of truth. Those who love America outside America (and who love it more than many Americans) are always shocked by it. My father would relate stories of this from his time growing up in Communist Czechoslovakia but found it hard to believe people could be so delusional.

Now I know better.

So...today there was NO COLLUSION between Pres.Trump and "Russia". In fact the Russian government organized protests against BOTH HRC and Pres. Trump including the largest one in front of Trump Tower. In fact the Russian program started in 2014 TWO YEARS before Trump won the Republican primaries nomination in 2016 (guess the Russians knew Trump was going to win before he even announced...God they are clever!) That is in the indictment...if American Leftists could read English as a FIRST language as well as I do as a SECOND they would know that. Or is the FBI and Mueller also part of the Trump-Russian conspiracy? I am sure that is what you now think...

Meanwhile Putin-loving Pres. Trump has agreed to the request by Ukraine DENIED by HRC when she was your Secretary of State to send anti-tank weapons to put down the pro-Russian rebellion in the east of the country.

But please Leftists, DO NOT LET ACTUAL FACTS OR ANY SENSE OF REALITY DISTURB YOUR FANTASY WORLD! And be comforted - your country's mental hospitals have enough room for you all.

UPDATE. So, all you Communistcrats here, want to tell me what happened to the RUSSIAN COLLUSION committed by President Trump you were all so happy and excited over? I have been proven right and you wrong...AGAIN!

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Graylight · 51-55, F

Your opinion and addition to the conversation are appreciated, but you're way off the map if you think you're presenting faxcts. You're merely presenting your side of the argument. I assume you are not a top level security clearance government employee privy to the details of the Russia investigation. Therefore, I can only assume you have no more "facts" than the rest of us

Abrienda · 26-30, F

@Graylight No I do not have such clearance but unlike some people here I can read English and took time to read the indictment. I look forward to you telling me where exactly I am not being factual...when you take time out from being snarky, of course, which seems to be your main "contribution" to the conversation so far.

Graylight · 51-55, F

@Abrienda You are interpreting what you consider evidence. That's not a presentation of fact.

"The sun rises each day" is a fact.

"There's no collusion based on timelines and what people said" is interpretation. Opinion. Nothing more.

Abrienda · 26-30, F

@Graylight What I consider evidence? I am QUOTING FROM AN FBI DOCUMENT. The Deputy AG of your country added and I quote "There is NO information that ANY American had knowledge of this illegally activity." That is a factual statement on my part about a statement of fact by Mr. Rosenstein. Or is YOUR security clearance higher than the Deputy AG of the United States? Because it is he I am quoting. If he is mistaken then I suggest you call both Rosenstein and Mueller and set them straight.

So I will try again...name me something I have written that is NOT FACTUAL about the information contained in the FBI indictments handed out yesterday or from the AG at his press conference?

It is obvious you have no idea what is going on. But thank you...you have nicely proven my point that Leftists live in a world of delusion.

windinhishair · 61-69, M

@Abrienda "There is NO information that ANY American had knowledge of [b]this [/b]illegally activity." Which means that Mueller has no information that there was American involvement in the activity covered by the indictment. You're correct on that point. But that says nothing about other potentially illegal activities. Nothing at all. And it certainly doesn't lead to a conclusion of no collusion at all on anything. It is the furthest thing from an exoneration.

Graylight · 51-55, F

@Abrienda See above.

Abrienda · 26-30, F

@windinhishair FURTHEST thing? Really? Sounds more like a wish on your part than an objective statement.

Do you or do you not know "collusion" is not a crime?

As for Graylight she let you be her mouth piece as twice she could not answer my question through lack of knowledge.

I feel for you both and sympathize with your sense of desperation.For over a year you have hoped for the ruin of Pres. Trump not caring you were actually doing what the Russians wanted; tearing your country apart. Pity the FBI took as its priority protecting your country against internet trolls than against people like Nikolas Cruz who they were informed about in January...but didn't follow up on.

windinhishair · 61-69, M

@Abrienda Yes, that's an objective statement. Not finding evidence of collusion on one matter related to Russian trolling says absolutely nothing about collusion in general. And yes, if trump and his criminal associates colluded to interfere in our elections, that WOULD be a crime.

Desperation? I'm perfectly content and patient in letting the Republican Mueller, appointed by the Republican Deputy AG Rosenstein, who was appointed by Republican trump and confirmed by the Republican Senate, fully investigate the issues surrounding trump. And I'll accept his findings, no matter what they say. Will you?

Abrienda · 26-30, F

@windinhishair You have shown you have an irrational hatred of Pres. Trump. You badly pretend otherwise. You laugh at the idea he may be innocent and find it impossible to accept so don't worry about me accepting the truth, worry about yourself when your fantasy world of hatred for Pres. Trump is finally shattered because you will likely be shattered with it.

windinhishair · 61-69, M

@Abrienda More hatred and vitriol from you. I've already said several times I will accept Mueller's findings with respect to trump, even if he is found completely blameless for anything. Will you?

Abrienda · 26-30, F

@windinhishair I don't care if you "accept" it or not. It's a silly question. And I am sure you describe anyone who disagree with you or reveals your insincerity is "hateful" to you.

But really your overheated and self-important posts are boring me now.

windinhishair · 61-69, M

@Abrienda Presentation devoid of facts. Then vitriol and hatred. And finally, a proclamation of being bored. In other words, you cannot sustain a discussion, and it is time for you to get out a loser with nothing to contribute.