Whether you agree or disagree with a so called memo none of has seen aren’t the media and the Dems trying to squash free speech?

Other than the fact that the warrant that approved the wiretaps will be thrown out and the so called cases based on those will be thrown out. @CopperCicada

@jackjjackson A judge has to throw out evidence, and the argument about whether this memo should even be admissible at a hearing, much less be given any weight will be interesting. My guess is it will be "taken into consideration" and ignored for the most part, at best.

Now, if you could put Nunes under oath and cross examine him, maybe...


Think he'd be willing?

Hmmm. “Well Judge we used information we knew was false to get the FISA court to give us warrants ... that's OK right?” Ruth Bader Ginsberg might present to believe that .... 🤔


@MistyCee

@jackjjackson that's not quite what it says, and even if it did, the next question is, what else do you have and how did you get it?


Which is why releasing one side is pretty annoying, IMO.