Jake Tapper v Stephen Miller Who won?

Miller stuck to his talking points although was unduly repetitive. Tapper kept starting new questions, never asked any questions related to the subject of the interview, never conceded a point to Miller and ultimately cut Miller’s microphone in mid sentence.

[image deleted]

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Northwest · M

Miller was there to deliver a speech, not answer questions. He kept re-delivering the speech. Tapper could have handled it better.

RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M

@Northwest I'm not actually sure he could have , he could barely get a word in edgeways.

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

Geez peeeezzzaaaa you don’t have to defend every action by every leftie. Tapper sure didn’t act like a pro. @RodionRomanovitch

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

Miller was definitely there do make some points. I’m surprised CNN had him on. Wonder if they will do it again? @Northwest

Northwest · M

@jackjjackson not after this. He was there to deliver a speech, and based on Tapper's reaction, he did not respect the pre-air rules of conduct. He acted like an ISIS suicide bombers. You get only one shot at it, no matter how many points you score for the boss.

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

I doubt anyone cares about appearing on CNN. Why would anyone want to follow CNN’s rules if any which are only designed to promote CNN agenda? @Northwest

Northwest · M

@jackjjackson You may not care about it, but those trying to reach the liberal base do. Miller's appearance was a stunt. His audience does not watch CNN, and the CNN audience is not going to buy it.

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

Exactly. CNN viewers would disaggregated if it Michael Moore said something favorable about the President. Tapper was lamely trying to do some cheap gotcha “journalism” and failed both at the gotcha part and as usual at being remotely a journalist. @Northwest