Does talking up a big game and failing to do anything say, "Lets build some nuclear tipped ICBMs?"

I mean the US have been super comfortable pillaging South America for decades but seem to ignore actual threats like Iran, Pakistan, North Korea and arguably Russia. I do admit the US talks up a big game when dealing with these countries, obviously though: "Actions speaks louder than words," and sometimes inaction says even more.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

SW-User

Those countries are justifiably protecting themselves from the warmongering US
Why is it only the US is *allowed* a nuclear deterrent?!

TexChik · F

@SW-User warmongering ? Are you daft? The history of the world always seems to be forgotten by the globalists . Being the lone super power is certainly going to greater jealousy and ignorant remarks . If aggression is appeased world war becomes inevitable . Clinton appeased North Korea and gave them money and nuclear reactors ... now they are trying to provoke annihilation by threatening the world with nuclear strikes . Obama not only enabled the core of the worlds terror to have nukes but also tried to weaken the US ‘s ability to mount any resistance to it . Suitcase nuke strikes all over the world will become reality if that obama blunder isn’t stopped . Who’s going to do that cupcake?

ButterFly2023 · 18-21, M

@TexChik I guess to sum up: Where did ISIS, Saddam, Pinochet and bin Laden get their help starting out?