Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

How bad a candidate do you have to be?

So according to the former interim leader of the democtrats Hillary had full access to all the democrats money for a year before the campaign started then had all the media give Trump 2 billion dollars worth of press to get him nominated as republican candidate then trash his every move once he had the nomination - yet Hillary lost the election in a landslide. Now that has to be some kind of record for bad candidate.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Northwest · M
For anyone who cares about what ACTUALLY happened, here's a link:

http://nbcnews.to/2hD7KYn

What that this really uncovers, is that we live in a post-truth world, confirmed by every single lie the President spreads through his tweets, or opens his mouth.
TexChik · F
@Northwest ahhh. The carefully re-worded liberal narrative ... about as reliable as 52 if Hilkaty’s “ I don’t recalls”
Northwest · M
@TexChik It might help if you actually read the MOU, but why would you, when you can read a Trump tweet, and get all your "intelligence" from it.
TexChik · F
@Northwest reading a libtard’s revision of history has nothing to do with the truth .
Northwest · M
@TexChik That's your narrative, and I don't really expect you to seek the truth. That's the real sad part. Or you can read the actual MOU between HFA and the DNC, so you can see for yourself what's true and what's lies. Spolier alert: Trump is lying.
TexChik · F
@Northwest it’s the tards narrative ... make serious but unsubstantiated charges ...when they get caught or defeated
Northwest · M
@TexChik Do you ever get tired of saying "tards"? Mental retardation is a serious issue, that affects a lot of people, and while bullies think it's funny to throw that word around, like it's hilarious, all they do, is expose their sick mentality.

That aside, it's not about a narrative, it's about the actual MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) between FHA (Hillary for America) and the DNC (Democratic National Committee), not a one liner, that does not tell the actual story.

The MOU states that the agreement was for the general elections, and NOT the primaries. The President lied.
TexChik · F
@Northwest Libtards ...
Northwest · M
@TexChik Just out of curiosity, to date, every single time you tried to respond with one-liners, you were 100% wrong. So, if this is really what you believe, what does that make you?
TexChik · F
@Northwest I’m sure to a tard , that’s true because I don’t spew CNN talking points because CNN creates news , they don’t report it ... and tards alwYs believe CNN
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@TexChik The actual wording of the MOU isn't CNN talking points. It is the actual wording of a signed agreement. It isn't Trump's take. It isn't Hillary's take. Is it really so hard if not impossible for you to actually read the agreement and see for yourself what it says?
Northwest · M
@TexChik Umm, no. This has nothing to do with CNN. This goes to every single argument you tried to make here. You're still using "tard". I wonder what it's like being you. You know, not having anything rooted in reality to say.
Northwest · M
@windinhishair She lost every single factual based argument on SW. The last time, it was about Jared Kushner not being sworn in. I posted a picture of him getting sworn in, but that did not phase her. I think she should try interacting with a mentally retarded person, perhaps she would understand what a miserable human being she is, for using this term in an attempt to bully.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@Northwest I really don't understand why people of any political leaning, or of no political leaning at all, wouldn't want to read readily available information for themselves and make their own minds up. Have we really reached the point where if people aren't told what to believe in 140 characters or less, they are incapable of independent thought?
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@Northwest I think TexChik and katielass must be the same person. Katielass kept insisting Comey's testimony completely exonerated Trump because of something he'd said. Of course, it was taken out of context, so not only did she refuse to watch the actual video of the testimony, or even the snippet of conversation in question, she said she knew what was said because she had her own tapes!!
Northwest · M
@windinhishair This, unfortunately, is the world some live in. These issues are usually pretty complex, and people do not want to process information on their own. This is why honest, independent media is important, because not all of us have the time to dig through all the raw data. This is why Trump is conducting a war against the media, calling it fake news. If his followers believe that, they will stop looking at anything other than his tweets, and Hannity/Breitbart for "guidance".

Trump is not randomly using "fake news" in his tweets. Sociologists will tell you that if you have a proclivity for a certain political direction, having it repeated four times, will cement that belief in your head.
Northwest · M
@windinhishair alas, kaitelass blocked me a long time ago. Not even a minor loss, as far as I am concerned, but yes, in my past interchanges with her, she sets aside anything real and only parrots the talking points that keep her owner happy.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@Northwest I think that is exactly what is happening. It is lies for a purpose. So Trump will say nothing about the Vegas shooter, yet will immediately latch onto the NYC truck killer, call him an animal, and use it to further his anti-immigration program while cementing hatred of immigrants in his adoring supporter's heads.
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@Northwest She blocked me when confronted with facts on Comey's Senate testimony. SW has been a much better place since.