Is it truly possible to have a non-biased media?

My own view is that it isn't possible to be unbiased but some sources have higher journalistic standards and integrity. All media and all language carries values and assumptions within it, often unacknowledged and sometimes at a subconscious level. However, not all media is the same. Some tell outright lies and some insinuate things which the readership are intended to take as fact. If I don't trust a source then I read through to find the quotes and the verified details.

I have confirmation bias too and everyone does, though I think it is a healthy thing if you can be critical of friends and allies from time to time.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Pitchblue

There used to be more integrity in journalism, some media is far to profit driven these days.

Burnley123 · 41-45, M

@Pitchblue I think that is an important point. Its always been profit driven but shrinking margins and a partisan audience compromise integrity sometimes.

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

@Pitchblue

So we are told but was there?

Let’s start with Dan Rather .......

Ynotisay · M

@Pitchblue I disagree when it comes to real journalism. In the "good 'ol days" when there were few outlets, the government and businesses had much more pull in regards to stories. The public was less informed because journalists didn't report on certain things. FDR's polio and JFK's affairs come to mind. We're in a golden age of REAL journalism right now. Unfortunately, it's being drowned out by online 'noise.'