Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Should women be allowed to go topless in public pools?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SW-User
if they want to, then they should...
without comment or stares.
MetalGreymon · 36-40, M
@SW-User

[quote]without comment or stares.[/quote]

Well that's just unrealistic.
SW-User
@MetalGreymon so they cover themselves, because you can't control yourself?
MetalGreymon · 36-40, M
@SW-User

No strawmen thanks🙂.
All i said was that it is unrealistic to expect topless women not to get attention.
SW-User
@MetalGreymon no straw man used...

it seems that you have the hang up

the breast isn't a sexual organ...

remember, human anatomy class in high school??
MetalGreymon · 36-40, M
@SW-User

Yes, straw man used.
You attacked an argument i never made "so women have to cover up because men can't control themselves".
I never said anything of the kind.

And you can say that breasts aren't sexual or should't be sexual all you like. The fact is that they are considered a sexual part of the female body.

So is it appropriate to be exposing children to that?
SW-User
@MetalGreymon go back to school...

I've stated what I intended.
MetalGreymon · 36-40, M
@SW-User

Congratulations. You've also failed to make any kind of counter argument.
But as long as your happy with it...
lol
SW-User
@MetalGreymon stating that breasts serve a biological and not a sexual function, was not a point..?
you are a smart one..
MetalGreymon · 36-40, M
@SW-User

It was a point, certainly.
...It was just a poor one which failed to be any kind of meaningful counter argument.
It's also wrong.
But i'll be generous. Perhaps what you meant to say just now was that breasts do not serve a [i]primarily[/i] sexual function, because they certainly [i]are[/i] a part of the body heavily involved in sexual activity if not reproduction.

And even assuming that's what you meant, saying that it's a body part serving a biological function is a transparently facile argument.
I can call upon that same "argument" to say that it should be fine to display your gaping asshole in public.
After all, it's just a non-sexual piece of anatomy which serves a biological function.

Now since you've chosen to make things personal and in light of your apparently limited grasp of debate 101, i think it's fair to point out the following:

I'm not sure if i am a smart one, but i appear to be rather smarter than you😏

lol it's been a pleasure