Bohr verses Einstein. The Universe Isn't locally Real.

How Physicists Proved The Universe Isn't Real - Nobel Prize in Physics 2022 EXPLAINED

A couple of note notes:

1. The title of the video is a misnomer. Reason is, the presenter points out at first... "[u]the universe isn't LOCALLY real[/u]". Meaning that what effects locally doesn't necessarily effect everything else in the universe.

I can see how this is true for many things. Yet as the presenter points out the speed of light isn't effected. So the particles of light must in some [u]minute[/u] way must effect us as well.

2. What is not accounted for even in the experiment. The unknown. The tree on the other side of the world has indeed fallen. Yet it's effects are so small or minute that they are immeasurable. As to what those effects are is a complete mystery.

[youtube=https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=txlCvCSefYQ]

Interesting argument none the less. Our knowledge of physics is so incomplete that we have barely scratched the surface.

To say one side or the other, you must know far more. And who is to say nothing but light from clear across the universe does not effect us?

Who will say that we know everything there is to know about physics?