This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Richard65 · M
Reductio ad Hitlerum
SW-User
@Richard65 which the Left do all the time
Slade · 56-60, M
@SW-User more than that it's their calling!
Slade · 56-60, M
@SW-User Hey, you never commented on the Dahmer coffee cup I sent you
Richard65 · M
@SW-User often with good reason, but this post makes zero sense. Who did Hitler take guns away from?
SW-User
@Richard65 they banned gun ownership among Jews and removed guns from people in countries they invaded.
and what "good reason"? 🤔
and what "good reason"? 🤔
Richard65 · M
@SW-User you and slade just display your predictable right wing stupidity. The Jewish population in Germany after 1933 was approximately 505,000 people out of a total population of 67 million, or somewhat less than 0.75 percent. And only a fraction of those Jews would actually own guns. To suggest the Holocaust was perpetrated because the Nazis confiscated guns from Jews is so ludicrous as to be laughable, if it wasn't so offensive. I'm aware of the usual bullshit right wing "scholarship" regarding the Nazis and gun laws. It's designed to fool weak minded people. People exactly like you.
Richard65 · M
@Slade those countries the Germans confiscated guns from had been invaded and defeated by the German Army. In effect, those conquered people already had possession of their guns but those guns didn't save them from the invading German army, who overpowered them then took their guns away AFTER they'd defeated them, so their guns hadn't had any effect anyway. Your argument makes zero sense, "dipshit".
SW-User
@Richard65 I'm not right wing, fool. It's irrelevant whether we owned guns or not - the point is that they were banned among the Jewish population.
btw, you don't even know my opinion on guns 😆 as the American Constitution states the right to gun ownership, I think you should be careful in evaluating your view on this matter. I wouldn't necessarily support access to guns being increased in the country I live, because they are not a part of its culture. It's different in the U.S though, and I have to appreciate that. It's not my country. All countries are different, and we must allow for people to exercise their good judgement either way...keeping in mind that the right to own guns is in their Constitution.
btw, you don't even know my opinion on guns 😆 as the American Constitution states the right to gun ownership, I think you should be careful in evaluating your view on this matter. I wouldn't necessarily support access to guns being increased in the country I live, because they are not a part of its culture. It's different in the U.S though, and I have to appreciate that. It's not my country. All countries are different, and we must allow for people to exercise their good judgement either way...keeping in mind that the right to own guns is in their Constitution.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
SW-User
@Richard65 you do realize that people can more effectively engage in uprising when they have access to weaponry?
Richard65 · M
@SW-User now you've desperately employed a straw man argument. You maybe need to read more before posting nonsense that makes you look silly. I'm done with you for now. So long 😘
SW-User
@Richard65 soo you can't respond to anything I've said, at all? You're really that incapable that you have to run away and leave every contention and rebuttal totally ignored? Not only that, you also had to falsely accuse me of using a logical fallacy.
Sad, pathetic boi 🥴
Sad, pathetic boi 🥴
Slade · 56-60, M
@SW-User andvthe Warsaw Ghetto uprising
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment