Do you think the 1969 moon landing was faked?

@Nitedoc an unmanned camera

@NerdyPotato No. When the shuttle touched down on the moon for the first time there were no cameras already set up and filming on the moon.

@Nitedoc nope, they placed those after the landing

@Nitedoc there was a camera attached to the lunar module. Neil Armstrong released it with the aid of a lever, and Buzz Aldrin operated the camera to film Armstrong stepping down.

@Nitedoc It was taken by a camera mounted on the Lunar Module (LM). Armstrong activated the camera and then deployed it from the MESA (Modularized Equipment Stowage Assembly) on the lunar surface.

@iamthe99 Oh sorry, I didn't even see you already responded.

The dust kicked up my the decending module would have made a huge thick dust and dirt clould on and aroung the module. That camera sure took a good picture during that big duststorm! Why did the pics taken by the astronauts later on show the lunar module to be shiny clean with no dust on it. With no wind on the moon the dust and dirt would remain where it fell all over the module.

@Nitedoc LOL 😂 Physics 101 coming up!

Quite apart from the fact that the module had already landed before Armstrong deployed the camera (clearly), the moon has no atmosphere. So no air, no "dust cloud," and no swirling storm.

The descent engine’s exhaust shot dust outward, not up, and without air, it settled quickly. As for the “shiny clean” module, it landed gently, and most dust blew sideways, not onto it.

No wind also means… nothing blew dust *onto* the module afterward either.

But sure, blame 1960s cameras for not faking dirt more realistically.
😂

@iamthe99 If there's no wind on the moon what made that flag they plated wave on the movie camera film? (Don't say a trick of the light).
Speaking of physics, are you aware of Newtons"s third law of motion? According to that the dirt and dirt should have fallen all over the landing module with the rocket thrust pointing straight down.

@Nitedoc Nope, I won't. Easy.

It seemed to flutter due to the astronauts' movements while planting it and the flag's design. In space, there’s no air to dampen motion, so the flag kept moving briefly. Also, a horizontal rod held the flag outstretched in order for it to unfurl, but it didn’t fully extend, causing wrinkles.

@iamthe99 Sounds pretty sus!

@Nitedoc Of course it does. Because you don't want to believe it.

@Nitedoc And by the way, if you want further evidence that it was real, then how about you look for the overwhelming evidence that it was faked from the one country that would have been THRILLED if it was:

The USSR.

Where's their evidence that US capitalist pigs faked moon landing?

Oh wait...

@iamthe99 There's no concrete evidence left, the Gov. destroyed it. Just like in the JFK assassination case.

@Nitedoc So the Gov raided the Kremlin and erased all Moscow’s files proving that America faked the moon landings, yes?

No.

Russia doesn’t have any evidence that the moon landing was faked, because there isn't any.

@iamthe99 Of course not! Some people in the US got rid of the evidence.

@Nitedoc I've answered every one of your questions thus far. Why do you still refuse to believe it? I'll tell you why. Because you feel that if you refuse to believe the "mainstream narrative", you believe yourself some kind of superior "free thinker" :D

@iamthe99 That's not it. Truth is I've been trolling you. I know the moon landing was real. I heard the the recording of first broadcast sent by Neil Armstrong. Over 6,000 HAM radio operators picked up the original broadcast as it happened. When Armstrong looked around and said to NASA " They're here! My Gog those spaceships are huge! They lined up right over there by that crater". Then NASA cut the feed and replaced it with two minutes of silence and claimed it was a technical glitch. Back on earth they were warned/threatened to never sat a word about those ships to anyone, ever!

@Nitedoc Ahh that old Onion satire! :D I remember that! I'll also ask my father who is also an amateur HAM operator and listened the moon landing. I think he has it on cassette somewhere.

@iamthe99 Sorry about that. I just felt a little evil creep up on me. I'm dead serious about the missing two minutes of tape and the thousands of recorings of what was said. Oh, this may be the best part. A few years ago a modern imaging lab tried to get NASA the ley them examine that first tape with what the missing two minutes on it. They refused. The company sued them under the Freedom of Information Act. In court the NASA rep. said they lost the tape! They - lost - the - tape !?

@Nitedoc Wow. Naturally the astronauts would have seen all the spaceships on the surface before they landed. Right?

Then I'm dead serious; you're beyond help.

@iamthe99 No they wouldn't. They weren't walking around in the module looking out the windows like they do in the movies. They were strapped to they're seats looking straight up. They didn't leave the module for several hours until a lot of checks and tests were finished.

@Nitedoc And then once the "feed" was cut for two minutes, I suppose they were told not to take any pictures of the huge rows of spaceships parked in the crater :D

@iamthe99 They did take some pictures of the spaceships. The Gov. confiscated everything and censored it before releasing any pics.

@Nitedoc I see. And your evidence for this is...? Let me guess, lost forever with no possibility of retrieval.