In the 1890s landowners in the Black Hills of South Dakota discovered the fossilized remains of a cretaceous period cycad forest.
An artist’s depiction of a cycadeoid forest in the Cretaceous period. Two people stand beside a cycad to illustrate the immense sizes these plants could have reached.
When Congress officially recognized the significance of South Dakota’s fossil forest, they intended to provide the land with permanent federal protection, ensuring its preservation for public use.
But after Congress designated the land a national monument in 1922, no funding was allocated to support the land. All the National Park Service could afford were a few signs saying, “Fossil Cycad National Monument, No Prospecting.” The warning wasn’t enough. Without enforcement or management, the site was soon stripped bare. Fossils were taken by the thousands, illegally lifted straight out of the ground for private and museum collections.
Because people suck and ruin everything.
With no fossils there was no longer any point in keeping the park as a national monument and in 1957 it was deauthorized.
Today, the only traces of South Dakota’s vanished fossil forest rest in a small number of museum collections, including the National Museum of Natural History
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Makes you wonder which federally protected lands may be deauthorized in the future
It is sad when you cannot even depend on things like this to endure, why would anyone have any faith in any positive thing the government passes today when a change in administrations can roll everything backwards, so that everything is just a constant cycle of one step forward followed by two steps back, of constantly forgetting any lessons learned from history once history recedes more than 5 minutes into the past, and then repeating the same mistakes again and again
Or history is even completely erased from any history books when the supposed free-speech crowd, with the most exteme of irony, finds history inconvenient to their regressive agenda
There has to be something better than democracy, US-style democracy in particular is the defintion of an unreliable partner that will be here today and gone tomorrow
