Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

The Democratic Process

I'm seeing a lot of concern trolling on the right about how Harris being the presumptive nominee is unfair to the close to 15 million Democrats who voted for Biden in the primary. My own take on this is that since Harris is Biden's VP, the assumption was that if something happened to him, Harris would take over. Well, something happened to him. In fact, technically Biden was never the nominee, just the assumed nominee, as no one will be nominated until the convention (or the virtual convention which will take place earlier to meet several states' filing deadlines).

So I'm asking our conservative SW members, if the way it was done wasn't "democratic," what would you suggest? If nominating Harris at the convention won't be good enough, then nominating anyone else who isn't even in Biden's administration, like Newsom, Whitmer, Shapiro, Pritzker, Beshear, Kelly, etc. won't be good enough either. There isn't time to redo the primaries. So what would you suggest? With all the complaining about this, I haven't seen a single suggestion of how the Democrats could have a "democratic" nomination process.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
MrSmooTh · 31-35, M
I don't care who the democrats put up there. Im voting for Trump. Unless Jesus Christ himself comes down and runs, my vote isn't changing.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@MarmeeMarch I'll post the "likely child r@psst" part next; it's testimony from some of the victims. Because of the graphic language, you'll probably have to click to view.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This message was deleted by its author.
This message was deleted by its author.
@MarmeeMarch You seem to have missed it when Ron DeSantis ordered the release of Epstein documents subject to a judge's review. The judge released a bunch in early July. Turns out Trump was identified as "Doe174" in the redacted versions.

Yes, Trump appears repeatedly in Epstein's phone logs and flight logs as well as in the testimony of r@ppe victims.

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/sure-looks-donald-trump-disguised-032415418.html?_guc_consent_skip=1721746832

Now we know who Trump was "protecting" here:
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@MrSmooTh
I don't care who the democrats put up there. Im voting for Trump. Unless Jesus Christ himself comes down and runs, my vote isn't changing
When did Jesus become a natural born American citizen and has he lived in America continuously for the last 14 years? Don't you think the orange traitor would demand to see his long form birth certificate?
This message was deleted by its author.
This message was deleted by its author.
@MarmeeMarch The links are in both my posts.
HINT: they begin with "https" see below.

You seem to have missed it when Ron DeSantis ordered the release of Epstein documents subject to a judge's review. The judge released a bunch in early July. Turns out Trump was identified as "Doe174" in the redacted versions.

Yes, Trump appears repeatedly in Epstein's phone logs and flight logs as well as in the testimony of r@ppe victims.

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/sure-looks-donald-trump-disguised-032415418.html?_guc_consent_skip=1721746832

Now we know who Trump was "protecting" here:
This message was deleted by its author.