pdxlinux · 41-45, M
i know that many dems would support gavin newsom but they are still in denial over the fact that their party (the dem party ) is controlled by people like debbie wasserman schultz . they have no interest in merit, the issues, the future of the country, nor anything else but ONE MOTIVE! to maintain control.
View 1 more replies »
SW-User
@nudistsueaz
I love Adam Corolla"s description of that snake: "he's a slithering eel of nothingness"
I love Adam Corolla"s description of that snake: "he's a slithering eel of nothingness"
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
@nudistsueaz it's true. The Dems aren't offering any success or anything progressive.
dancingtongue · 80-89, M
It's the money, not the Internet perse, imho. The two political parties control the elections, making it almost impossible for third party or independent candidates to qualify on enough states' ballots to win or to gain enough traction to appear in debates or gain serious news and social media attention. Back in the day the oligarchs brokered nominations in the backrooms of the party conventions. Progressives finally broke their hold on the conventions by instituting the system of primary elections to select the delegates pledged to candidates having votes at the conventions. Nowadays, thanks to the Supreme Court's Citizens' United decision, the oligarchs flood the primaries with money for their candidates to the point that alternative candidates simply drop out very early and you wind up with two Nominees for President and the Nominating Conventions have yet to be even held.