Lock Him Up!

@pdockal Special counsel Robert Hur is currently investigating Biden. As special counsel, he has all the resources he needs. Will you give him time to do his job?

Special Counsel John Durham spent four years investigating Hillary and the FBI's Russian investigation. After four years had had two failed prosecutions of low level FBI agents and got another agent sentenced to community service. Nobody stopped or impeded his investigation. Will you accept that the whole four year Durham investigation was a nothingburger?

@ElwoodBlues

They ALL get away with whatever they do so why are we @ each others throats oven ANY of them ?

Nobody is going to jail!

@pdockal [quote]They ALL get away with whatever they do [/quote]
There's overwhelming evidence of Trump's criminality and corruption.

After long investigations, there's zero evidence that Obama or Hillary or Biden did anything wrong. Sorry, dude, the evidence says your bothsidesism is bulllshit.

@ElwoodBlues

Guess your drinking the kool aide

So your don't think Hillary did anything wrong ?
Bengazi ?
Shredded hard drives and documents ?

@pdockal So you have no evidence of wrongdoing? Just speculation?

Or do you think you know more than all EIGHT (8) separate republican controlled House and Senate committee investigations of Hillary Clinton and Benghazi? Remember, none of them found any wrongdoing they all were forced to exonerate her in their written reports. But you know better.

Wait, I thought you said you didn't "do alleged," LOL!!!

@ElwoodBlues

It was all over every news report & papers so if you can't read then i can't help you

@pdockal No, the news reports were full of speculation.

Don't you remember the EIGHT (8) separate republican controlled House and Senate committee investigations of Hillary Clinton and Benghazi? Remember, none of them found any wrongdoing they all were forced to exonerate her in their written reports.

the EIGHT (8) separate exonerations were all over every news report & paper, so if you can't read then i can't help you.

@ElwoodBlues

You use the word [b][i]FORCRD[/i][/b] which proves my point about trusting anything coming from the government when powerful political people are involved.

What about Epstein ?

Just because the government says something is legal doesn't mean it's right. Congress is morally corrupt and beholding to big business and the doners who get them elected.

What about weaponizing the DOJ & FBI ?

@pdockal In the context I used it, "forced" means the evidence they gathered allowed no other conclusion than exoneration. I used "forced" in the sense of a mathematical proof.

[quote]What about Epstein ?[/quote]
Epstein died in Aug 2019. Under both the Trump & Biden admin,the DoJ has had access to all his materials. So far they've found nothing they could prosecute. This is another case where you took speculation for certainty, Or maybe Qanon misled you. Anyway, now you're finding out that was a mistake. But who knows, maybe something will come out before the statute of limitations is up.

Epstein cultivated people on both sides of the aisle as well as many intellectuals, so if justice is as partisan as you'd like to believe, the Trump DoJ would have gone after dems and the Biden DoJ would have gone after repubs. That hasn't happened. So either there's a giant conspiracy or, perhaps, there's nothing with sufficient evidence to prosecute.

[quote]What about weaponizing the DOJ & FBI ?[/quote] Yeah, and what about faeries and daemons and witches throwing hexes and voodoo and black magic?? They're all superstitions based on speculations and allegations.

Look, John Durham, independent special counsel, had subpoena power and effectively infinite investigative resources for as long as he wanted. The result afte r4 years? Two failed prosecutions of low-level FBI agents and community service for a third low-level FBI agent. Maybe he's incompetent, and maybe Tucker Carlson knows more than Durham. But I don't think so. I think many people have been fooled by the speculations and allegations of poeple like Tucker, just like they were fooled cheap talk from Qanon and from Trump's "lock her up" and other campaign lies.

Now that the evidence against Trump is overwhelming, right-wingers are pivoting from "Trump is innocent & these are political attacks" to "everybody on both sides is equally corrupt." But the evidence never said Trump was innocent, and the evidence certainly doesn't say everyone is corrupt. That's just another lie for manipulating low-information suckers.

@ElwoodBlues

Good luck as your blind to the corruption and manipulation and influence that congress has and their perversion of justice.

So as to NOT waste time here's an example:

We were told after 9-11 that the air was safe to breathe and now we're finding out it wasn't. Please don't even try to spin this as i as there that day and numerous days after.

Last comment: I'm not supporting Trump or Biden or Republicans and especially [b][i]NOT[/i][/b] any democrats because I'm not brainwashed.

I'm done commenting no matter what you say or try to twist etc. etc. etc.

@pdockal I plead guilty to the sin of not seeing a nEw GiAnTt CoNsPiRaCy under every rock and bush. I plead guilty to the sin of knowing that in real conspiracies there are always leakers and/or whistleblowers.

BTW, do you assume the 911 air statement was intentional harm from the highest levels of government? Or could it be some low level functionary made a mistake? Why do you assume malignant intent when simple incompetence explains so much??

[quote]Good luck as your blind to the corruption and manipulation and influence that congress has and their perversion of justice. [/quote] If you look closely, you'll see that you are only accusing [i]Democrats[/i] of being able to secretly corrupt everything without leakers and/or whistleblowers.

I find it ridiculous to believe that the Dems capable of so many simultaneous GiAnTt CoNsPiRaCiEs. You've proposed about half a dozen [i]perfect[/i] Dem GiAnTt CoNsPiRaCiEs. The whole idea of recourse to GiAnTt CoNsPiRaCiEs to explain everything that disagrees with your preconceptions is a sign of a superstitious mind with weak critical thinking skills.