@
pdockal Your dilusional
I will start believing you understand when you can demonstrate "your" knowledge of grammar.
China:Rapidly increasing production, aiming for top producer status
I'm sure you think this means something, or is somehow related to what I said. It is not, and it does not. And really, you're connecting this to anything. Is it about renewable, nuclear, coal? That's what happens when you ask ChatGPT something, but you forget how to say what it's about. Gramar.
France:Second in total generation, but holds the highest share of domestic electricity production (~65-70%)
Huh? Nuclear power? Yes, France relies on nuclear monoliths to generate up to 70% of power. So what? How's that connected to what I said?
Russia: Significant producer with high-capacity reactors
20% of Russia's electricity is nuclear monoliths generated. Fun fact: the Chernobyl nuclear reactor Twas designed by a team of Soviet scientists and engineers, primarily from the NIKIET.
And? And how is that related to my comment?
The United States is the world's largest producer and consumer of nuclear energy, generating nearly 30% of the world's total nuclear electricity with 94 reactors as of 2024–2025. The U.S. nuclear fleet provides about 18-20% of the country's electricity, with the highest total capacity (roughly ).
And? How's that even remotely related to what I said? BTW, 24.2% of US power generation is from
RENEWABLES.
But really, when you that you "worked
on a nuclear power plant," what you mean is that you work
in a nuclear plant. Grammar is important Homer.
Let me know when you decide to respond to my actual comment.
