Why are conspiracy theorists called theorists?

The opposite of a conspiracy is a scheme for benevolence. To expect there to be plans for good is to be a benevolence theorist, right?
People who doubt conspiracy theorists or call them crazy often talk like they have high faith in leaders. Why?

Have you ever [i][c=003BB2]thought[/c][/i] about that?

What do "benevolence theorists" require to accept that the powers or leaders they trust in do not have good will at heart for them? Especially here in the West?

Has the world really been looking like benevolence was the aim by the powers in control? Are things getting better? Is life getting easier with all the power, influence, and money being siphoned after pillaging foreign nations? Or has it truly been conspiracy after conspiracy? Life getting worse and worse for [b]you[/b]? Do the people you viciously defend the image of not conspire against you?

And this is a serious question. I'm talking the laws passed, do they really serve you? Or do they find scheme after scheme to plot against you and either drive you that much more insane or force that much more money from you into their hands? 🤔

A question for a true thinker

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Zonuss · 41-45, M

Because people like to brand and put labels on people they do not understand. So it's easier to call them [b]crazy[/b] rather than deal with reality or what is in plain [b]sight. [/b] 🙂

RebelliousSpirit · F

@Zonuss If it would be in plain sight people wouldn't call them crazy. "Do your own research" and not backing claims up with substantial evidence leads at least to reasonable doubt and if the claims are just simplifications with added information that has been disproven calling them crazy is less unreasonable.

Zonuss · 41-45, M

@RebelliousSpirit False. There is evidence. And much of it is in plain sight. Some people have a natural ability to [b] discern [/b] things that others cannot. Some people are good at spotting patterns. Some are good at decoding even the most complex of things. This does not denote insanity. It means that you're just too slow and spiritually incompetent to see what is actually there. 🙂

RebelliousSpirit · F

@Zonuss Spiritually incompetent? 😅

I agree some people are good at spotting paterns and recognize societal issues and change. Saying that it is there is just not enough. If people feel more enlightened then why not outline the thought process and everything one did to come to a conclusion so that it can be peer reviewed.

Zonuss · 41-45, M

@RebelliousSpirit People who are enlightened are on a higher vibration.
And have an insight that gives them more depth into a situation than an average human being.

RebelliousSpirit · F

@Zonuss That sounds preachy like they are some sort of messiah.

Zonuss · 41-45, M

@RebelliousSpirit Well I'm not religious.
So you pretty much just [b]proved[/b] my point. 🙂

Zonuss · 41-45, M

@RebelliousSpirit Think about all the things in the universe and the ocean that you have never seen. But others have. Why would you be so quick to discard the things they [b]have[/b] actually seen. You're on the inside looking out. Perhaps that rubs you the wrong way. 🙂

RebelliousSpirit · F

@Zonuss I don't discard for example the well documented experience and research of marine biologists.

Zonuss · 41-45, M

@RebelliousSpirit That's not what I'm talking about.
I'm speaking about the supernatural.
Not everything is [b] documented [/b] by the way.