This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
justanothername · 51-55, M
I prefer climate change as it’s a more accurate description of what’s happening. As an example, the four seasons are still happening but the storms and extremes that happen in those seasons are more extreme, whether it’s a bigger more intense snow dump after a very hot summer or more extreme droughts that affect crop production. It’s all part of climate change.
Thorstormbringer · M
@justanothername More extreme compared to what? That’s the thing: the NWO propagandists decided to arbitrarily choose a pretty stable era (the 60s & 70s) to represent some false, golden era of normality for climate and then compare ever thing since then to it detrimentally. Why? Because it fits ther agenda!
justanothername · 51-55, M
@Thorstormbringer more extreme compared to 30 years ago and no where near as frequent as storms are now.
Thorstormbringer · M
@justanothername You didn’t understand my point at all, alas. You want to make a true picure of climate averages, you use a much longer baseline of data. Like centuries, or millennia. Not a few decades. Otherwise, it is self serving political junk science
justanothername · 51-55, M
@Thorstormbringer Let’s just say that climate change has completely fucked my ski season. That’s no conspiracy. We had fuck all snow last season and at this stage next season is looking similar. I call that climate change.
justanothername · 51-55, M
@Thorstormbringer Warner sea temperatures everywhere are impacting the weather. The western pacific is experiencing Warner wetter summers with constant flooding while the eastern pacific up and down the west coast if the US is much cooler resulting in much drier summers, water shortages and heat waves. In the South Pacific it is called a La Niña summer. That’s not conspiracy that’s a 1.5 degrees warning of the ocean in the western pacific.
Thorstormbringer · M
@justanothername ok. Fine. How far back do dependable records go for any climate data at all?
About 150 yrs.! Tops!
Not enough to say what is going on is man affected
About 150 yrs.! Tops!
Not enough to say what is going on is man affected
justanothername · 51-55, M
@Thorstormbringer I’m pretty sure that Australia has never experienced the level of flooding it is currently experiencing in the last 150 years. That’s why I’m preferring to use the term “climate change” rather than global warming. Because the changes that are stating to happen ARE changes that ARE different from what we are accustomed to.