This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ElRengo · 70-79, M
This shows how even Nobel laureates may say what collides with scientific evidence.
ElRengo · 70-79, M
@Nexus
He should be also so kind to explain the evolution climate data taken by several countries that have instalations in Anctartica for more than 70 years.
THIS amongst so much registered facts that would need a serious explanation if he haves one.
He may debate the origin of such changes, of course.
But facts need no "interpretation" but causal explanations.
Otherwise, is a philosophic preference and not Science.
He should be also so kind to explain the evolution climate data taken by several countries that have instalations in Anctartica for more than 70 years.
THIS amongst so much registered facts that would need a serious explanation if he haves one.
He may debate the origin of such changes, of course.
But facts need no "interpretation" but causal explanations.
Otherwise, is a philosophic preference and not Science.
Thorstormbringer · M