Fact Check: Henry Ford Health Study Of Vaccinated Vs. Unvaccinated Children Did NOT Pass Internal Peer Review -- It Compared Apples To Oranges
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fact-check-henry-ford-health-045903814.html?guccounter=1
Uh oh. Someone Fucked up.
There was a Who Study on Facebook saying the World Health organization did yet another study showing Vaccines don't cause autism and an Asshat Anti Vaxxer was in the comments like "That's not what the Henry ford study said."
Oh you mean this study? the one that compared Apples to Oranges and was so methodologically flawed as to be practically worthless as evidence or proof of much of anything at all? Glaring biases that it failed to account for like oh I don't know Vaccinated children are already more medically complaint and thus are more likely to actually go to the doctor and and Unvaccinated Children are Rebellious against their Medical professionals much more frequently going against medical advice and going to the Doctors much less frequently and thus They go undiagnosed.
There were glaring red flags like None of the unvaccinated had ADHD but that's obviously unscientific because it's not natural that NONE of any cohort that large would have that issue so mistakes were made when doing this study clearly.
I appreciate that the Journals didn't publish this because it never would have passed peer review but someone leaked it, but I don't know what they were trying to prove by doing that but I doubt they wanted to prove what they did which is that they're scientifically incompetent and don't know how to do science properly, it's an embarrassment to the people who's names are on the paper really.
Uh oh. Someone Fucked up.
There was a Who Study on Facebook saying the World Health organization did yet another study showing Vaccines don't cause autism and an Asshat Anti Vaxxer was in the comments like "That's not what the Henry ford study said."
Oh you mean this study? the one that compared Apples to Oranges and was so methodologically flawed as to be practically worthless as evidence or proof of much of anything at all? Glaring biases that it failed to account for like oh I don't know Vaccinated children are already more medically complaint and thus are more likely to actually go to the doctor and and Unvaccinated Children are Rebellious against their Medical professionals much more frequently going against medical advice and going to the Doctors much less frequently and thus They go undiagnosed.
There were glaring red flags like None of the unvaccinated had ADHD but that's obviously unscientific because it's not natural that NONE of any cohort that large would have that issue so mistakes were made when doing this study clearly.
I appreciate that the Journals didn't publish this because it never would have passed peer review but someone leaked it, but I don't know what they were trying to prove by doing that but I doubt they wanted to prove what they did which is that they're scientifically incompetent and don't know how to do science properly, it's an embarrassment to the people who's names are on the paper really.
