Peace Talk Uncertain

US VP JD Vance was supposed to return to Pakistan for talks but hadn’t left Washington yet. Iran says it won’t attend more talks if the US keeps “pressure and threats”.

My Take: Right now it’s a classic standoff: Trump extended the ceasefire but kept the Navy blockade, which Iran sees as an act of war, so they’re rejecting talks while “pressure and threats” remain. VP Vance not traveling to Pakistan signals the US isn’t fully prioritizing diplomacy yet, and Iran firing on a ship in Hormuz shows the ceasefire is already shaky. Both sides are posturing for leverage — the US wants uranium concessions before easing pressure, Iran wants sanctions/blockade relief before negotiating seriously. Until one side decides the cost of no deal is worse than conceding, talks will stay stuck and the situation remains unstable.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

ArishMell · 70-79, M

Neither country trusts the other, and I can't see much trust being regained in the present situation.

This war is affecting so many other nations, I wonder if they will eventually come together and offer a treaty of their own with Iran, including sanctions-lifting, returning to safe passage of ships and restoring the nuclear treaty; sidelining the USA in the process.

America will protest but did sideline the rest of the world in first destroying the nuclear-development treaty with Iran, and now in attacking the country.

Iran's coast is the Eastern side of the Persian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz and Gulf of Oman; but the opposite coasts are of other nations; and Iran must recognise that.