Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Trump says Machado ‘doesn’t have the support’ in Venezuela, wasn’t consulted

by Ryan Mancini - 01/03/26 5:30 PM ET
The Hill

President Trump on Saturday said Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado “doesn’t have the support” within Venezuela to be its next leader after U.S. troops captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, and said she was not consulted prior to the operation.

“I think it would be very tough for her to be the leader,” Trump said at a press conference from his Mar-a-Lago resort hours after the attack. “She doesn’t have the support within or the respect within the country.”

Trump said the administration did not talk to Machado about the attack and possibility of leading Venezuela. He leaned on Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodríguez as Maduro’s successor, who he claimed was sworn in as the country’s president. Trump said he would work with her as the U.S. will “run” Venezuela until there is a peaceful transfer of power.

“I think it would be very tough for her to be the leader,” Trump said at a press conference from his Mar-a-Lago resort hours after the attack. “She doesn’t have the support within or the respect within the country.”

Trump said the administration did not talk to Machado about the attack and possibility of leading Venezuela. He leaned on Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodríguez as Maduro’s successor, who he claimed was sworn in as the country’s president. Trump said he would work with her as the U.S. will “run” Venezuela until there is a peaceful transfer of power.

“I just had a conversation with her, and she’s essentially willing to do what she thinks is necessary to make Venezuela great again,” Trump said. “Very simple.”

Rodríguez later dismissed Trump’s remarks, saying in a televised speech that Maduro is the country’s “only president.“

Machado said the “hour of freedom has arrived” in the hours following Maduro’s capture.

“Today we are ready to enforce our mandate and take power,” Machado said in a letter shared on the social platform X, translated by Le Monde. “Let us remain vigilant, active and organized until the Democratic Transition is realized. A transition that needs ALL of us.”

Machado placed her support behind opposition leader Edmundo González Urrutia, whom Maduro defeated in Venezuela’s elections in 2024 amid allegations of widespread voter fraud. She said Urrutia must be “recognized as Commander in Chief of the National Armed Forces by all officers and soldiers.”

Residing in Europe, Machado said she would return to Venezuela whether or not Maduro remains in power. Her exact whereabouts are unknown.

U.S. troops captured Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores following strikes across Venezuela’s capital, Caracas, early Saturday morning. The U.S. Army’s Delta Force captured them from Maduro’s compound and brought them to the USS Iwo Jima, which is heading for New York where the two will face charges.

Latin American leaders condemned the attack. Mexico’s President Claudia Sheinbaum said on X that her country’s government “strongly condemns and rejects the military actions carried out unilaterally in recent hours by armed forces of the United States of America against targets in the territory of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, in clear violation of Article 2 of the Charter of the United Nations (UN).”

“These acts represent a most serious affront to Venezuela’s sovereignty and yet another extremely dangerous precedent for the entire international community,” Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva posted on X. “Attacking countries, in flagrant violation of international law, is the first step toward a world of violence, chaos, and instability, where the law of the strongest prevails over multilateralism.”

Chilean President Gabriel Boric Font called for “a peaceful solution to the serious crisis” in Venezuela.

“Chile reaffirms its commitment to basic principles of International Law, such as the prohibition of the use of force, non-intervention, the peaceful settlement of international disputes, and the territorial integrity of States,” Font wrote on X. “The Venezuelan crisis must be resolved through dialogue and the support of multilateralism, and not through violence or foreign interference.”
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ArishMell · 70-79, M
So, if I understand that correctly, Trump has merely whisked the Maduro family away but wants the Maduro government still to run Venezuela, albeit under Washington control?

He shows no respect for the main opposition leader.

So what is he trying to achieve, and how?

I hope he knows because the whole world is watching and may well want explanations...

Maduro might be "bad" and reportedly plenty of his own citizens would agree; but what has happened is bizarre, to say the least, even very highly illegal.
@ArishMell Not quite. He pretty much said that he wants the US Oil industry to run the country. Make it a literal colony of Exxon Mobil.


The "main opposition" leader is almost entirely manufactured by the US and is not worthy of any respect.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow I see. Thankyou.

I'd always thought that oil companies are better at running oil-wells than countries....
@ArishMell They are great at stealing the resources of other countries and extracting all the wealth out of the country to make Americans and Europeans wealthy at their expense.

Colonialism will not benefit Venezuela in the slightest except for those who get paid for selling out their own country.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow The sad thing is that anyone sensible in charge would negotiate so that even if they are foreign companies extracting the oil, the country that owns the stuff receives a fair price for it. With no need for attempted colonising and the like.
@ArishMell Sorry but that is total fantasy. Capitalism literally works on not paying a fair price. That is literally where profit comes from.

And that inevitably necessitates colonialism because there is only so much wealth you can exploit domestically. And the cardinal law of capitalism is that profits must increase forever.

And no foreign country should dictate what they can and cannot do with their resources and where the money goes. Your very statement assumes as a given that western companies are entitled to make money off of their resources.

And Maduro even tried that. But the thing is you don't negotiate with the slave master.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow I did not assume "Western" companies - which presumably would be Asia to Americans - have any such entitlement, at all.

They do not, even if some think they do.

Capitalism might need colonies, as defined and demanded in the 18th and 19C Centuries, but that is not axiomatic. Instead we now have capitalist companies buying other countries' assets, not normally one country taking the other.

Anyway, the biggest "colonist" now is not the USA but the Communist state of the People's Republic of China, and excepting its annexing of Tibet and threatening Taiwan militarily, it works in far more stealthy ways.*

The USA spent much of the last Century doing that, including plundering British industry and intellectual-property, but did not take over the country itself!

Modern capitalist companies will indeed try to keep their pay low, but that is not automatic because they sometimes need compete with others to attract employees. Also, in some countries, union pressure and employee-welfare laws have brought legal pay minima and other protections.

...

*(In this context, I wonder about China's development of a few towns in the very far West of Tibet, round the edge of an arid plain below the mountain-ridge frontier with about four "---stan" countries. The road ends at the largest, directly below the Afghan border. By Google Earth photographs, these small, partly self-sufficient, towns show no obvious purpose or advantage to China, such as mining or manufacturing, certainly not agriculture.)
@ArishMell Your suggestion that they somehow had it coming and only had to offer a sweet deal to the Americans and this would not happen. And currently the only countries that have the expertise to rebuild and modernize oil infrastructure are in the USA, Britain and maybe the Dutch with Shell.

So it would be exclusively Western companies.


Capitalism in any era requires colonies. Pretending it magically changed in the 20th century is just willful blindness.



And your anti China polemic is just factually wrong to the point of being outright lies. The USA is the largest colonial empire by far and it is not even remotely close.

Tibet and Taiwan are Chinese territory. I am sorry you failed history class in high school.

To suggest otherwise is like suggesting the USA is currently "annexing" Hawaii.

Even though the US started all this out by regime change in Hawaii in the 1800s.


To find an example of China annexing a neighbour you have to go back to probably the 1600s.


The USA is the new British Empire. The fact you want to desperately pretend otherwise doesn't change reality.


And are you seriously delusional enough to think that Exxom Mobil will give Venezuelans good jobs when billion dollar companies pay actual Americans starvation wages?

That is next level mental gymnastics to justify American colonialism.


We get it. You have a Xenophobic hatred of China.


Number of American foreign military bases is between 700 to 1000 depending on how you count them.

China 0.


Russia, I think we are at 3 total.

But sure. Pretend your cold war tropes are the real problem.