Kwek00 · 41-45, M
Trump 2016:
[media=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RCskPgypTY]
... when he was running for office. It was all going to be simple... until:
Trump 2017:
[media=https://youtu.be/5oQLf65N-AU]
... he found out when he was in power, that healthcare actually is a really hard toppic to grasp and work on.
Then he went out of office in 2021... so he had 3 extra years in office + 4 years out of office. But in 2020, during the debate he only came up with a "concept of a plan".
Trump 2020:
[media=https://youtu.be/8p6zZZ3DPGE]
... it's easy to yell and blame... but realising something is just not his style. 🤷♂
If this blows up in his face too, maybe he can bail people out with the money that is left after bailing out the farmers. First you create tariffs that normal American citizens payed for (aka, you highered taxes). Then you brag about how good the new income is doing by highering taxes while also running on lowering taxes. And then when the consequences start to show, you need to reinvest money payed (largely) by citizens to help out the farmer that you royally f'd over. That money could have gone to anything usefull, like building roads or expanding healthcare... but no, the citizens need to pay for failed policies now. It's so dumb, but hey, it's all cool when you have no ability to do any selfreflection and just keep blaming scapegoats for your screw ups.
[media=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RCskPgypTY]
... when he was running for office. It was all going to be simple... until:
Trump 2017:
[media=https://youtu.be/5oQLf65N-AU]
... he found out when he was in power, that healthcare actually is a really hard toppic to grasp and work on.
Then he went out of office in 2021... so he had 3 extra years in office + 4 years out of office. But in 2020, during the debate he only came up with a "concept of a plan".
Trump 2020:
[media=https://youtu.be/8p6zZZ3DPGE]
... it's easy to yell and blame... but realising something is just not his style. 🤷♂
If this blows up in his face too, maybe he can bail people out with the money that is left after bailing out the farmers. First you create tariffs that normal American citizens payed for (aka, you highered taxes). Then you brag about how good the new income is doing by highering taxes while also running on lowering taxes. And then when the consequences start to show, you need to reinvest money payed (largely) by citizens to help out the farmer that you royally f'd over. That money could have gone to anything usefull, like building roads or expanding healthcare... but no, the citizens need to pay for failed policies now. It's so dumb, but hey, it's all cool when you have no ability to do any selfreflection and just keep blaming scapegoats for your screw ups.
Charity · 61-69
Anybody that thinks that a billionaire or millionaire cares about anyone's social security is willing to believe a lie.
Far too many politicians say what will get them votes and keep the votes they have and do the total opposite once elected.
Those under 62 may not qualify for it anyway before Trump. But what affects will these changes have on those who already received social security and a small limited amount.
Far too many politicians say what will get them votes and keep the votes they have and do the total opposite once elected.
Those under 62 may not qualify for it anyway before Trump. But what affects will these changes have on those who already received social security and a small limited amount.
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
Clinton was caught on tape inside the capitol discussing the long term bipartisan goal to cut social security, back in the day!
The bipartisan coalition is the darling of poor Americans, coast to coast. They'd never vote outside the Sacred uniparty.
The bipartisan coalition is the darling of poor Americans, coast to coast. They'd never vote outside the Sacred uniparty.
Prison1203 · 61-69, M
Strictgram · 70-79, C
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
View 4 more replies »
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@sunsporter1649 Jsul3 shows that you're lying (did you learn from your King?) and all you have is a cartoon repeating your lies.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@newjaninev2 A family of four migrants in New York City receives more monthly funding than a family of four that includes a military veteran who receives disability compensation. Migrants coming to New York City are being given prepaid debit cards that in certain cases, like food assistance, dwarf the amounts provided to families of legal status. For example, the average family of four's monthly Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) payment is $713, but migrant families of four receive $1,400 a month. That total is also higher than military veterans' disability compensation. A veteran who has a 50 percent disability rating and a spouse and one child receives $1,255.16 once every four weeks, according to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. When a child under age 18 is added to that family, the payment rises $51 to $1,306.16 a month—still nearly $100 less than what a migrant family of four receives from the prepaid card assistance.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@sunsporter1649 What are their names and specific details?
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment