Q: Ok, I'll do the seemly popular thing do to just prove how ludicrous extreme polarity truly is. Which is better on the gun issue?

Poll - Total Votes: 8

Stagnation?

Mass murder?

Something from a different direction?

Show Results

You can only vote on one answer.

Is complete stagnation better or mass murder of everyone better?

Complete opposites! Truly!

I give an out because I see both sides as ludicrous! Nothing is completely bipolar!

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M

I'd vote except "stagnation" makes no sense, have no idea what you're trying to say.

DeWayfarer · 61-69, M

@ChipmunkErnie the polarity is killing this issue either way!

Stagnation is the result! For the result is to let dominant countries to run the USA over.

ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M

@DeWayfarer I can see now what you meant by stagnation, though I think a better word might be "inaction" or even "deadloclk". As to your last sentence, no idea what you mean.

DeWayfarer · 61-69, M

@ChipmunkErnie I'm taking a page out of history! The Roman empire! By 400 AD it was powerless to stop Attila the Hun in 437 AD! Why? Because it stagnanted! No inventiveness = no power!

Weapons in the hands of civilians could have stopped him!