Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

The idea that life begins at conception is religious not scientific.

Poll - Total Votes: 39
Yes
No
I don’t know
Show Results
You can only vote on one answer.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SW-User
When the fuck else could it Dr Frankenstein?
DailyFlash · 56-60, M
@SW-User according to the Bible it’s with your first breath.
SW-User
@DailyFlash that's alot of crap and it's biologicalky insane. Nobody's ever jad two conceptions
DailyFlash · 56-60, M
@SW-User “ After God formed man in Genesis 2:7, He “breathed into his nostrils the breath of life and it was then that the man became a living being”. Although the man was fully formed by God in all respects, he was not a living being until after taking his first breath.

In Job 33:4, it states: “The spirit of God has made me, and the breath of the Almighty gives me life.”

Again, to quote Ezekiel 37:5&6, “Thus says the Lord God to these bones: Behold, I will cause breath to enter you, and you shall live. And I will lay sinews upon you, and will cause flesh to come upon you, and cover you with skin, and put breath in you, and you shall live; and you shall know that I am the Lord.”

In Exodus 21:22 it states that if a man causes a woman to have a miscarriage, he shall be fined; however, if the woman dies then he will be put to death. It should be apparent from this that the aborted fetus is not considered a living human being since the resulting punishment for the abortion is nothing more than a fine; it is not classified by the bible as a capital offense.”
specman · 51-55, MVIP
@DailyFlash I believe that just is in the case of Adam. Since he was the first man. I believe when he breathed in Adams nostrils He also gave him a soul in that breath. Not 100% though.
specman · 51-55, MVIP
@DailyFlash oops! i replied before reading farther