He gets what Musk is doing and supports it. With Dorsey in the WH and Musk making sure the media gets honest Americans would thrive
[quote] “In principle, I don’t believe anyone should own or run Twitter,” Dorsey tweeted Monday night. “It wants to be a public good at a protocol level, not a company. Solving for the problem of it being a company however, Elon is the singular solution I trust. I trust his mission to extend the light of consciousness.”[/quote]
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Either Musk will impose his own preferred version of censorship on Twitter, or he will allow it to turn into a cesspool like Gab and 4Chan, driving away most major advertisers. You can’t have an unmoderated platform and expect it to be acceptable to more than the worst elements in society.
I prefer to give him the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise. If Dorsey is good with it who are we to quibble. I would like to see an irrevocable permanent ban of Piers Morgan and I think most would be in favor. @Lila15
@jackjjackson Why would Piers Morgan be banned? He brings in the clicks. Musk will only ban the most extreme users whose presence will drive away advertisers and other users.
@jackjjackson Of course, Musk can ban people that he simply doesn't like. I'm not sure that will include Piers Morgan.
What amazes me is how this is actually considered important. "Bored billionaire buys moderately popular social media platform that he has no idea how to run." Twitter isn't even in the top ten of social media companies. It's got around the same number of users as Reddit. Heck, Pinterest has more users.
