I think us decent people should lower ourselves to the hunters level and hunt the hunter and shoot him dead and see how they feel being on the recieving end of a bullet .Will they still say its sport then .
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
sure, why don't you take a gun, which the hunters indoubtedly know better how to use, into the woods, which the hunters know way better, and try to shoot armed men.
What could go wrong? Besides, it's way better to thin the deer herd with Buicks and Toyotas than with Remingtons and Marlins.
we got rid of the wolves because they have an annoying habit of eating 4 year-old kids. Absent an apex predator, deer, as an example, die by causing car wrecks or starving in the contest for winter forage. If it were you would you rather be hit by a car and die without medical treatment, starve to death slowing and contribute to mass starvation of your fellows or be shot to death. Those are your only options.@Rhodesianman
@redredred Look at it from wolves point of view they were threatened by humans so they went hunting for sport or is that suddenly wrong because humans are the ones being hunted .
If for one moment you want to equate any animals life with that of a humans, i invite you to visit a hospital, a university or an observatory built by any species other than humans.
We are qualitatively different from mere animals and if you disagree you might be the exception to that qualitative difference.@Rhodesianman