Just over the mountains in the promised land lies a holy city built by God's own hand...
For those who believe in God, they know that He is omniscient. When Eve ate from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, the serpent lied to her saying you will become omniscient. Eve soon learned that the fruit she ate was mortality and she will die one day. She sealed this fate for all mortals, with the exception of Enoch and Elijah.
@cinsac Many, if not most Christians, in both the Eastern and Western have believed since earliest times that our Lady was assumed bodily into Heaven, though some hold that she died, or a least fell asleep first. What became of Moses' body is a open question, though St. Jude makes a very brief mention of an argument between the Devil and St. Michael about it.
@LeopoldBloom God created man to make their own decisions, or free will. Eve knew that she wasn't suppose to eat the fruit of that tree. Eve acted out of free will and took the fruit and ate it.
@cinsac It's actually a metaphor for the transition from an animal state to human consciousness. They didn't eat from the tree of eternal life because they had no concept of their own eventual death. The only way to prove you're immortal is to live forever; if you don't know you're going to die, you might as well be immortal. My dog doesn't know she will die eventually, so in her mind, she will live forever. By eating the tree of knowledge, they became aware of their own eventual deaths and by doing so, became human.
The other aspect of the story is about the transition from a hunter-gatherer lifestyle to an agrarian one. They go from just wandering around picking fruit to tilling the soil and living "by the sweat of their brow." Carl Sagan pointed out that knowledge is also made possible by our huge brains, so women being cursed to give birth in pain (because babies' heads are so big) goes along with that. No other animal has as much trouble giving birth as humans do.
These stories were what people came up with to explain their experienced reality. They're much more interesting as allegory than taking them literally, which diminishes them and is ultimately disrespectful to the people who wrote them.
@allygator18 It's not revisionist at all. The text is the Robert Alter translation taken verbatim, and the illustrations simply depict what the text says. You may want to look at it before you dismiss it.