Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Leftists participation in Capitol disorder

FBI charges blm supporter with fermenting Capitol disorder. It was widely believed that leftists agitated and participated in the disruptions. That proof is now available. No excuse is made for non leftists who participated.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Soros is a four letter word, anyone that comprehends history is well aware of that fact .

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjNn4bbbgSw]
tindrummer · M
@tindrummer booth
tindrummer · M
@tindrummer baloney- balcony booth is where it all got spun

The actors union is proud it murdered honest Abe, hello any one out there McFly 🤣
tindrummer · M
@checkoutanytime Sorry but I have no idea what you just said. Please explain.
@tindrummer the act'ors killed Lincoln, read all about it friend in the..

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3dvbM6Pias]
tindrummer · M
@checkoutanytime One actor did but ok, never mind.
@tindrummer dito!
@checkoutanytime John Wilkes Booth was named after the British MP John Wilkes, a supporter of the American Revolution.
@LeopoldBloom and Charles Darwin was as well, did you have a valid point?
@checkoutanytime Just a coincidence.

Charles Darwin was born in 1809, a little late to support the American Revolution. Or did you mean Charles Darwin was named after John Wilkes? I'm confused.
@LeopoldBloom he was using his fajers/ grand Pappas works observering nature, and mutilated them, I'm fairly certain the prior to Charles was also anti brit/ a revolutionist.
@checkoutanytime Charles Darwin made his own observations; he didn't "mutilate" anything. He didn't come up with the concept of evolution by natural selection since it was first mentioned by the Roman poet Lucretius. All Darwin did was describe the mechanism in detail, although he was hampered by his inability to explain how characteristics were passed down. Mendel's pioneering work in genetics and heredity still lay in the future.

In France, Lamarcke is considered the "father of evolution" because his explanation, while incorrect, predates Darwin's. Lamarcke believed that acquired characteristics could be passed down, a forgivable error as he wasn't familiar with genetics either.
@LeopoldBloom no Charles manipulated his grandfather's writtings
@checkoutanytime Have you read [i]Origin of Species[/i]? It's easy to come up with a theory, but not as easy to support it with real-world observations.

Lucretius, the Roman poet, said [quote]All things, including the species to which you belong, have evolved over vast stretches of time. The evolution is random, though in the case of living organisms, it involves a principle of natural selection. That is, species that are suited to survive and to reproduce successfully, endure, at least for a time; those that are not so well suited, die off quickly.[/quote]

However, Lucretius did not explain the mechanism for this, or catalog any observations in support of his statement. Erasmus Darwin didn't do much better. It was his grandson who provided the detailed explanation of natural selection that has been refined since then but never superseded.