Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Calculus is an inaccurate measurement of area

Calculus is actually an inaccurate representation of a mathematical solution to the area of a shape. The very premise of calculus is incorrect the very concept that Infinity can derive the area within a shape is fundamentally inaccurate. Because it will always leave an area of the shape unmeasured. So using calculus as an accurate measurement of an area within a shape is false. Because the area within a shape is finite and cannot be solved with an equation that uses a component that measures its proximity through infinity. It will always be an approximation of its area but not it's actual area. In that there is a finite area within a shape there is a finite mathematical solution in the solving of its area. All that calculus does is measure an infinitely smaller area of a shape that is infinitely left unmeasured undefined. To somehow equate the infinity measures the area of a shape with its eventual solution is false. The solution to the measurement within a shape is a finite equation that defines the measurement of the finite area that measures the finite area within it.
SW-User
You mention finite and infinite a lot. How closely can calculus determine the area of a shape? Is it 99.9% accurate, leaving only an infinitesimal unresolved?
James25 · 61-69, M
@SW-User I have watch numerous videos on calculus measuring the area of a shape for example a circle. But I have always found it to be somewhat inaccurate. And that their premise is measurement by Infinity. Here is a basic understanding of calculus at the 5th grade level you can watch that explains how they use Infinity as a measurement.

[media=https://youtu.be/TzDhdvVg9_c]
SW-User
@James25 I'm more interested in any temporal mechanics application of calculus that deals in infinitesimals- as might apply to escalating test sets.
James25 · 61-69, M
@SW-User I'm afraid I am at a lost to that particular subject matter. But it does sound interesting if you care to playing it. If not it's okay
Wireman · 31-35, M
This sounds more like describing climate change. Or whatever it will be called next.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment