Considering that the whole point of the group was to "decide what was in error and how bad that error was" in a "rational way", I just think it's odd that the lesson to be learned here (that it is absurd to assess error based on "gut feeling" or "icky face") never seemed to register with anyone in the group... I can only assume the group was basically a joke where everyone just had/have fun, and didn't had any serious concern with "errors" or the concept of "right" and "wrong"...?