Did he really think that "pulling out" of ****** was such a progressive idea that it wouldn't matter who would get murdered as a result?

I don’t have a problem pulling out of Syria. Our goal should always be less deployment instead of more. The problem is that he’s too much of a headline craving simpleton to actually utilize his own state department and defense department to develop and execute a controlled withdrawal that’s coordinated, negotiated, and communicated in a way that [i]doesn’t[/i] result in the slaughter of our allies. This situation punctuates in excruciating fashion how he’s patently unqualified for the job.