Who is the most interesting serial killer?

I've yet to find mine. Their actions aren't admirable, but you can't deny that their stories catch attention.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Stellen · 36-40, M

Not really.

They are all weak people with little to no self control.

I'd even go so far to say they are very boring individuals. As they lack depth.

Sudsy · 31-35, F

@Stellen I bet you're making a lot of criminal psychologists flip out right now!
I have to disagree on lacking depth, their minds are something to look into.
(Again, not admiring them, what they did was absolutely awful)

Stellen · 36-40, M

Your interested in their psychological make up.... to which there's a lot to learn. Yes I'd agree.

But that's not depth.

Sudsy · 31-35, F

@Stellen That most certainly is depth! How a person's neurology is flawed is still something we don't understand. I still remember looking over neuron faults in college, I still don't understand to this day.

quinnVneck · 31-35, F

@Sudsy ah criminology... i wonder if detective work is involved in the curriculum

Sudsy · 31-35, F

@quinnVneck I was in for chemistry with a minor in biology, so I can't really answer what's needed for criminology

quinnVneck · 31-35, F

@Sudsy i'm in bs psychology no majors yet...but we're focused on the clinical portion of therapy and commorbidities...

Stellen · 36-40, M

@Sudsy maybe it makes you deep....

It doesn't make them deep...

They lack depth. Which is practically the definition of a psychopath.