Wonderful life! Joe Blow is in the White House, and his son, Hunt-a-Blow is there, too!

@MarthannBann888 says [quote]Only the truly ignorant have no idea that the cheating took place in carefully chosen polling sites.[/quote]

[b]LOL!!! [/b] So many errors, so little time!!

Lets begin with your biggest error. No, it wasn't ignoring Arizona, and it wasn't pretending Georgia hadn't done thorough hand recounts and signature audits. No, your biggest error is the one that proves you didn't study a STEM field. Your biggest error, well known to science students, is that you made your hypothesis AFTER the measurements were conducted!!

You claimed there were four close states, so cheating only needed to happen in those four. BUT! Those four were only known to be close AFTER the election. Making your hypothesis about critical precincts AFTER the election is known in science as a "Type 1 Error." Look, PRIOR to the election, a cheater would need near perfect knowledge of the outcome to know where to cheat. Since that near perfect knowledge didn't exist, any cheating attempt with a high probability of success would need to cheat in many more places.
[quote] in amounts certain to ensure success in those critical precincts, [/quote]
Nope. You can't be sure of critical precincts prior to the election. An after-the-fact hypothesis is a subtle error that trips up many science students in the early years. A cheater can't know where to do precision targeted cheating until AFTER the votes are tallied, and by then it's too late. And THAT error is the biggest hole in your argument.

[quote] Some of these self same precincts insisted on new voting machines manufactured in the most brutal communist country in the western hemisphere where its people are searching for food having eaten their pets and zoo animals. [/quote]
Why so coy? Why are you afraid to name the machines and the nation? Is it because it'll be easy to debunk your claim if you make it explicit?? Look, vote counting machines are super easy to check. Hand count the ballots and run them thru the machine and compare counts. Georgia did that in 159 different counties; see below. The 'Cyber Ninjas' did all kinds of audits in AZ and found only a clean election and some extra votes for Biden. Mich & Penn also audited their machines; links are below.

[quote] Curiously, though it was later reported from various wire services that Speaker Pelosi and Attorney General Barr possessed stock in the company. [/quote]
Again, you can't name the company because then your claim would be easy to debunk. Your claim is dependent on once-upon-a-time fairy tale levels of vagueness, LOL!!!

The next biggest hole in your argument involves down-ballot races; that's where the cognitive dissonance comes in. If someone is cheating ballots, are they really gonna forget to cheat for House of Representatives??
In Arizona, democratic House candidates got 33,000 fewer votes than the democratic presidential candidate. In Georgia, the differential was 81,000 fewer. Mich: 115,000 fewer, Penn, 113,000 fewer; Wisc 43,000 fewer. Do you really think these wily perfect cheaters are gonna forget the downballot races? LOL!!!

Sorry, the only logical explanation for the downballot underperformance by House democrats is that republican voters went against Trump in the presidential election, but for the downballot republicans. And that's exactly what the polling said about suburban housewives voting against Trump.

[sep][sep][sep]

Now let's go state by state:

[quote] There were four states involved whose win margins were very close. Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Georgia. [/quote] [b]Wrong wrong wrong!![/b]
The closest margin, 10,457 was Arizona. But I bet you left AZ out of your list because the very thorough $6 million 'Ninja' recount eliminated all possibility of cheating. Either that or you have no idea what you're talking about. Next closest, 12,670, was Georgia. Georgia checked signatures on absentee ballots, and both hand counted and machine counted every single vote in every county. See [b]https://www.ajc.com/politics/no-fraud-georgia-audit-confirms-authenticity-of-absentee-ballots/QF2PTOGHLNDLNDJEWBU56WEQHM/[/b] and [b]https://www.wrcbtv.com/story/42925055/no-sign-of-foul-play-found-in-audit-of-georgias-voting-machines[/b] The Georgia hand count of 4.9 million votes DESTROYS the narrative that crooked voting machines were involved. In most of GA's 159 counties, the hand count matched or differed from the machine count by less than 10. Yet cons still pretend crooked machines are a valid complaint; are they too dumb to follow the logic?

Then comes Wisc, with a 20,682 vote margin; which than is more than 0.5%. Trump's rich supporters paid $2 million for a recount of the two most democratic counties in Wisc, and found ZERO evidence of fraud, but netted Biden 87 more votes, LOL!!! [b]https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/completed-wisconsin-recount-confirms-bidens-win-over-trump[/b]

Michigan?? Biden won Michigan by 154,188 votes! [b]https://www.michigan.gov/som/0,4669,7-192-47796-553386--,00.html[/b] Here's an example, from one of Trump's many lawsuits, of a court evaluating 'evidence' that fails to meet the standards: [quote] “‘I heard someone else say something,’” Michigan Judge Cynthia Stephens said on Thursday, summing up Connarn’s affidavit. “Tell me how that is not hearsay. Come on now!” ... “The assertion that Connarn was informed by an unknown individual what ‘other hired poll workers at her table’ had been told is inadmissible hearsay within hearsay, and plaintiffs have provided no hearsay exception for either level of hearsay that would warrant consideration of the evidence.” [/quote]

Biden also won Penn by 81,660 votes, and the audits came up clean: [b]https://www.inquirer.com/news/pennsylvania/spl/pa-election-results-risk-limiting-audit-results-limitations-20210310.html[/b]