Top | Newest First | Oldest First
Roe hasnt actually been overruled yet, and the final decision might be more definite along those lines, but it would cause a whole bunch of secondary problems to go too far with it.
Who can assert this child's rights when they conflict with those of it's mother and/or father?
Putting a bounty on the heads of abortionists and moms who terminate is being tried, but that doesnt address stuff like protecting fetuses from moms smoking or doing drugs during pregnancy.
I think even this Court won't be completely oblivious to opening up a huge can of worms and dumping them on us, especially when they'll cost a mint and likely end up expanding government interference with families.
Who can assert this child's rights when they conflict with those of it's mother and/or father?
Putting a bounty on the heads of abortionists and moms who terminate is being tried, but that doesnt address stuff like protecting fetuses from moms smoking or doing drugs during pregnancy.
I think even this Court won't be completely oblivious to opening up a huge can of worms and dumping them on us, especially when they'll cost a mint and likely end up expanding government interference with families.
Changeisgonnacome · 61-69, F
SUPERVlXEN · F
[media=https://youtu.be/3MH54ewvcWo]
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
Time to ignore the Court.
This message was deleted by its author.
RocktheHouse · M
@CopperCicada The right to live is a universally acknowledged right. It's not based on science or religion. Moreover, the right to life is guaranteed in the preamble of our Declaration of Independence.
This message was deleted by its author.