2nd amendment gun ruling.

To summarize, the right to allow ALL Americans, of sane and insane mind to purchase semi automatic weapons to enable a good mass shooting of innocent unarmed victims any where and at any time keeps the NRA and Republicans very happy.

It also serves to make America one of the most unsafe countries in the world for regular citizens.

No one should ever attempt to take away this right.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

BizSuitStacy · M

Do you even know the content of the majority opinion? That's a purely rhetorical question. Of course you don't. If you did, you wouldn't drag out the same broken record talking points.

"The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not 'a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees,'” Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in the majority opinion. "We know of no other constitutional right that an individual may exercise only after demonstrating to government officers some special need."

Human1000 · 51-55, M

@BizSuitStacy The decision begs the question of what could be regulated. I don't see a backstop when "self-defense" plus "traditional gun control regulation" are combined. Who is exempt from self-defense? There would be some, but not based on logic. There is none.

TexChik · F

@BizSuitStacy Every time libs push gun control the scotus strengthens the 2A.

BizSuitStacy · M

@TexChik Yes. Thomas's opinion is just common sense.

BizSuitStacy · M

@Human1000 why does the decision beg the question of what could be regulated?

Human1000 · 51-55, M

@BizSuitStacy Because there are many regulations that could violate the right of self-protection by firearm.